This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States courts and judges, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
United States federal courts,
courthouses, and
United States federal judges on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States courts and judgesWikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judgesTemplate:WikiProject United States courts and judgesUnited States courts and judges articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Much of this article has been brought in "as is" from a BLP. Given the cut and paste nature of the edits, it is probably Below-Start-Class in quality. Duh -- it needs editing! Please help. --
S. Rich (
talk)
15:57, 2 September 2010 (UTC)reply
I suspect legislation has died. Accordingly, it now fails notability. The article was created as an effort to remove a vanity piece by a SPA and substitute something more encyclopedic. But once the BLP hero of the legislation was deleted (by his own request), the proponent of this article (Mattwashdc) discontinued editing. I suggest AFD.--
S. Rich (
talk)
05:43, 16 November 2011 (UTC)reply
I should note that this legislation has been reintroduced in the 112th Congress, although so far no hearings have been held. The title is "Equal Justice for Our Military Act of 2011." The bill numbers are H.R. 3133 and S. 1664. The title of the article refers to the topic of equal justice rather than a specific bill in a specific Congress. There appears to have been plenty of media coverage meeting
WP:GNG. An AfD would probably result in a keep. I will make a few edits to update this for the 112th Congress.
Safiel (
talk)
16:33, 16 November 2011 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States courts and judges, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
United States federal courts,
courthouses, and
United States federal judges on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States courts and judgesWikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judgesTemplate:WikiProject United States courts and judgesUnited States courts and judges articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Much of this article has been brought in "as is" from a BLP. Given the cut and paste nature of the edits, it is probably Below-Start-Class in quality. Duh -- it needs editing! Please help. --
S. Rich (
talk)
15:57, 2 September 2010 (UTC)reply
I suspect legislation has died. Accordingly, it now fails notability. The article was created as an effort to remove a vanity piece by a SPA and substitute something more encyclopedic. But once the BLP hero of the legislation was deleted (by his own request), the proponent of this article (Mattwashdc) discontinued editing. I suggest AFD.--
S. Rich (
talk)
05:43, 16 November 2011 (UTC)reply
I should note that this legislation has been reintroduced in the 112th Congress, although so far no hearings have been held. The title is "Equal Justice for Our Military Act of 2011." The bill numbers are H.R. 3133 and S. 1664. The title of the article refers to the topic of equal justice rather than a specific bill in a specific Congress. There appears to have been plenty of media coverage meeting
WP:GNG. An AfD would probably result in a keep. I will make a few edits to update this for the 112th Congress.
Safiel (
talk)
16:33, 16 November 2011 (UTC)reply