This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Epsilon Carinae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:30, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Is 70 R☉ the radius of Epsilon Carinae? ---- Joey P. - THE OFFICIAL 19:47, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
@ ZaperaWiki44 Thank you very much. I still use 70 R☉ for Avior. @ Lithopsian, could you please tell me how to calculate the radius of a star using the luminosity and effective temperature? Tell me in a step-by-step process. ---- Joey P. - THE OFFICIAL 05:07, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
I won't edit the results into Wikipedia. Just please tell me how to.---- Joey P. - THE OFFICIAL 18:25, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Epsilon Carinae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:30, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Is 70 R☉ the radius of Epsilon Carinae? ---- Joey P. - THE OFFICIAL 19:47, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
@ ZaperaWiki44 Thank you very much. I still use 70 R☉ for Avior. @ Lithopsian, could you please tell me how to calculate the radius of a star using the luminosity and effective temperature? Tell me in a step-by-step process. ---- Joey P. - THE OFFICIAL 05:07, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
I won't edit the results into Wikipedia. Just please tell me how to.---- Joey P. - THE OFFICIAL 18:25, 15 October 2017 (UTC)