 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically
review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Epitestosterone.
|
Since T/E ratios of 10/1 are sometimes found and ratios greater than 4/1 are grounds for stripping a title - seems like this test is not a very reliable one. Perhaps another test would help clear all this up: Was his lutenizing hormone surpressed?
Originally posted by 70.172.200.165 on 1:20, 8 Aug 2006. Moved from the main article into the talk by Rifleman 82 17:27, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
Could someone please cite the second sentence in the fourth paragraph under "Epistestosterone and testosterone?" Wjbean 23:40, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
"However, it is not uncommon to find T/E ratios of up to 4:1 and even T/E ratios of 10:1 can be normal for some individuals. T/E tests are most common because a person may naturally have high levels of testosterone, but even so T/E ratios tend to stay close to 1:1."
So which one is correct? Seems kind of contradictory—perhaps this section could be worded better.-- Alex van Poppelen ( talk) 05:34, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
This article should be (re)written from PMID 14630088, which is the only recent (2003) review of epiT. Xasodfuih ( talk) 05:13, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
, said the news...
|
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
|
| Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically
review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Epitestosterone.
|
Since T/E ratios of 10/1 are sometimes found and ratios greater than 4/1 are grounds for stripping a title - seems like this test is not a very reliable one. Perhaps another test would help clear all this up: Was his lutenizing hormone surpressed?
Originally posted by 70.172.200.165 on 1:20, 8 Aug 2006. Moved from the main article into the talk by Rifleman 82 17:27, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
Could someone please cite the second sentence in the fourth paragraph under "Epistestosterone and testosterone?" Wjbean 23:40, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
"However, it is not uncommon to find T/E ratios of up to 4:1 and even T/E ratios of 10:1 can be normal for some individuals. T/E tests are most common because a person may naturally have high levels of testosterone, but even so T/E ratios tend to stay close to 1:1."
So which one is correct? Seems kind of contradictory—perhaps this section could be worded better.-- Alex van Poppelen ( talk) 05:34, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
This article should be (re)written from PMID 14630088, which is the only recent (2003) review of epiT. Xasodfuih ( talk) 05:13, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
, said the news...