![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
++
To the editor that removed tags from this article about sourcing and other issues and does not use an edit summary, we have a problem. Make an argument for your edits here before returning 'see also' information also and other information. Earl King Jr. ( talk) 03:28, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
I am a well educated person with a very good understanding of English, and a long-standing interest in politics and political theory, and this article is incomprehensible. I've read it twice, and I still don't understand what "Epistemic democracy" is or how it differs from other democracies or why it differs or even if it differs. Assuming it is notable, and not a neologism, I think you need to delete all of it and start over. -- OpenFuture ( talk) 05:25, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
++
To the editor that removed tags from this article about sourcing and other issues and does not use an edit summary, we have a problem. Make an argument for your edits here before returning 'see also' information also and other information. Earl King Jr. ( talk) 03:28, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
I am a well educated person with a very good understanding of English, and a long-standing interest in politics and political theory, and this article is incomprehensible. I've read it twice, and I still don't understand what "Epistemic democracy" is or how it differs from other democracies or why it differs or even if it differs. Assuming it is notable, and not a neologism, I think you need to delete all of it and start over. -- OpenFuture ( talk) 05:25, 27 April 2016 (UTC)