This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Epiphone Les Paul redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Should this be combined into Gibson Les Paul article since they are pretty much identical, and epiphone is owned by gibson —Preceding unsigned comment added by Produde94 ( talk • contribs) 00:51, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
I removed the following from the ES section. This page needs some serious work. Marshall Stax ( talk) 06:37, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Epiphone Les Paul. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:32, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
Support quick deletion.
Weeb Dingle (
talk)
06:53, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
I feel like at the very least this needs to be reorganized. All sections/section headers are just different models of the series/subseries, not even under a "Variations" section. It makes it difficult to figure out how everything is structured and to add new information if you find some. I found articles to use as sources for adding different models and information on Epiphone LP but because of the way the article is currently laid out, it seems like it would just make it worse, even if I could identify where the information should go.
I know this project isn't super active lately, but I'm going to look at other articles and try and identify a way to clean this up so that it can be easier to judge for deletion and make it easier to comprehend.
Lizzyd710 ( talk) 16:11, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Epiphone Les Paul redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Should this be combined into Gibson Les Paul article since they are pretty much identical, and epiphone is owned by gibson —Preceding unsigned comment added by Produde94 ( talk • contribs) 00:51, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
I removed the following from the ES section. This page needs some serious work. Marshall Stax ( talk) 06:37, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Epiphone Les Paul. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:32, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
Support quick deletion.
Weeb Dingle (
talk)
06:53, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
I feel like at the very least this needs to be reorganized. All sections/section headers are just different models of the series/subseries, not even under a "Variations" section. It makes it difficult to figure out how everything is structured and to add new information if you find some. I found articles to use as sources for adding different models and information on Epiphone LP but because of the way the article is currently laid out, it seems like it would just make it worse, even if I could identify where the information should go.
I know this project isn't super active lately, but I'm going to look at other articles and try and identify a way to clean this up so that it can be easier to judge for deletion and make it easier to comprehend.
Lizzyd710 ( talk) 16:11, 24 October 2022 (UTC)