From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Reassessment

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch
Although the last reassessment was earlier this year, since then a new government has been elected and has had time to consider this subject. I hope someone comes forward to update this article as there seem to be plenty of recent sources for this important topic. Chidgk1 ( talk) 14:19, 2 November 2022 (UTC) reply

I notified several projects and people but no one has come forward yet. Specifically the article at the moment does not meet number 3 of the good article criteria which says a good article should be:

"Broad in its coverage:

it addresses the main aspects of the topic;

and it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)"

I won't do any more tagging of specifics as I tagged quite a lot several months ago. I am sure you can see a lot more problems yourselves but an example of a section which should have less detail and more summary style is the dumping section, which goes into too much detail about one particular dumping permit. Chidgk1 ( talk) 15:02, 4 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Unfortunately no response so failed Chidgk1 ( talk) 11:44, 21 November 2022 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Reassessment

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch
Although the last reassessment was earlier this year, since then a new government has been elected and has had time to consider this subject. I hope someone comes forward to update this article as there seem to be plenty of recent sources for this important topic. Chidgk1 ( talk) 14:19, 2 November 2022 (UTC) reply

I notified several projects and people but no one has come forward yet. Specifically the article at the moment does not meet number 3 of the good article criteria which says a good article should be:

"Broad in its coverage:

it addresses the main aspects of the topic;

and it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)"

I won't do any more tagging of specifics as I tagged quite a lot several months ago. I am sure you can see a lot more problems yourselves but an example of a section which should have less detail and more summary style is the dumping section, which goes into too much detail about one particular dumping permit. Chidgk1 ( talk) 15:02, 4 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Unfortunately no response so failed Chidgk1 ( talk) 11:44, 21 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook