This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 August 2020 and 11 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jwright2371.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 20:48, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 11 January 2019 and 26 April 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Madmann16.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 20:43, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
one thought: (nuisance) isn't what could be called an encyclopedic term, exactly. is my previous suggestion (environmental) so far fetched? -- Kku 12:52 30 May 2003 (UTC)
As we agreed, I have moved noise (nuisance) to noise (environmental). However, I would like to defend the word nuisance. It is used in a legal context in the UK (and probably elsewhere) to mean something that interferes with another's right to enjoyment. I changed it not because it was not 'encyclopedic', but because it was too narrow. -- Heron
The middle two paragraphs should be moved and merged into noise music and a mere mention left behind to illustrate subjectivity of noise. I'm slapping on a cleanup tag. Whitejay 251 14:59, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
Do hyperacousis and auditive hypersensibility belong to this page? After all, they produce more unwanted noise for their sufferers. --anon
This page is now one of many forming a hierarchy under Noise. Please look at that page before editing this, and also note my comments regarding the fact that noise is not a good candidate for disambiguation. There's much to do by way of expanding and cross-linking now, but please do so with reference to the 'root page' -- Lindosland 17:46, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
this is the only logical step, since they are definitionally the same, but most of the public uses the term noise pollution. to scientists these terms are the same in meaning...also theere is no meat presently under the Environmental noise article. Anlace 04:16, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
Not all environmental noise is noise pollution, though all noise pollution is environmental noise. Hyacinth 11:24, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
I would support a merge into both Noise Pollution and Noise. I think a partial redirection of links to Noise Pollution for references to undesirable noise and other redirections to just noise for general references would be appropriate. I am not keen on using Environmental noise. What is the difference between plain noise and Environmental noise? - Shiftchange 01:43, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
Hi, created Noise in its present form as part of an excercise to sort out a mess of noise articles, some of which were by folk who seemed think noise was a term resricted to their field. I stopped disambiguation, and started the Root page concept because I realised that all the noise topics do have a lot in common - disambiguation is for different meanings of a word. If Shiftchange had looked at Noise he would have realised that its a huge topic for which I created a series of articles, all listed in the 'Branch pages' list, and all (except one) beginning with Noise. It may be because I'm in the UK, but I'm not very familiar with the term 'noise pollution', and favour 'Environmental noise'. I would say that the term environmental noise encompasses Industrial noise(though I think this still warrants its own page) which is not generally regarded as pollution, and air conditioning noise, for which the term pollution doesn't really feel right. Whether to use Environmental noise or Noise (environmental) doesn't matter, as we just redirect from the other name. I prefer Noise (environmental) to emphasise the common feature in the list of branch pages, and this seems to be done a lot on Wikipedia. Note the ease of navigating noise topics, whatever their name, using the navigation offered by the Root page concept. -- Lindosland 14:30, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
No good idea - see this new article -- Fmrauch ( talk) 13:24, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Environmental noise has a special meaning in Europe and should not be merged with noise pollution, even if there are many connections between these words. -- Fmrauch ( talk) 21:39, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
this article is about environmental noise as it is defined in Europe AND about noise regulation in Europe. It's no good idea to mix this content with other articles, because there are analog differences like Noise mitigation, Noise pollution, Noise regulation etc. -- Fmrauch ( talk) 22:12, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Environmental noise. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:24, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 03:06, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 August 2020 and 11 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jwright2371.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 20:48, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 11 January 2019 and 26 April 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Madmann16.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 20:43, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
one thought: (nuisance) isn't what could be called an encyclopedic term, exactly. is my previous suggestion (environmental) so far fetched? -- Kku 12:52 30 May 2003 (UTC)
As we agreed, I have moved noise (nuisance) to noise (environmental). However, I would like to defend the word nuisance. It is used in a legal context in the UK (and probably elsewhere) to mean something that interferes with another's right to enjoyment. I changed it not because it was not 'encyclopedic', but because it was too narrow. -- Heron
The middle two paragraphs should be moved and merged into noise music and a mere mention left behind to illustrate subjectivity of noise. I'm slapping on a cleanup tag. Whitejay 251 14:59, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
Do hyperacousis and auditive hypersensibility belong to this page? After all, they produce more unwanted noise for their sufferers. --anon
This page is now one of many forming a hierarchy under Noise. Please look at that page before editing this, and also note my comments regarding the fact that noise is not a good candidate for disambiguation. There's much to do by way of expanding and cross-linking now, but please do so with reference to the 'root page' -- Lindosland 17:46, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
this is the only logical step, since they are definitionally the same, but most of the public uses the term noise pollution. to scientists these terms are the same in meaning...also theere is no meat presently under the Environmental noise article. Anlace 04:16, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
Not all environmental noise is noise pollution, though all noise pollution is environmental noise. Hyacinth 11:24, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
I would support a merge into both Noise Pollution and Noise. I think a partial redirection of links to Noise Pollution for references to undesirable noise and other redirections to just noise for general references would be appropriate. I am not keen on using Environmental noise. What is the difference between plain noise and Environmental noise? - Shiftchange 01:43, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
Hi, created Noise in its present form as part of an excercise to sort out a mess of noise articles, some of which were by folk who seemed think noise was a term resricted to their field. I stopped disambiguation, and started the Root page concept because I realised that all the noise topics do have a lot in common - disambiguation is for different meanings of a word. If Shiftchange had looked at Noise he would have realised that its a huge topic for which I created a series of articles, all listed in the 'Branch pages' list, and all (except one) beginning with Noise. It may be because I'm in the UK, but I'm not very familiar with the term 'noise pollution', and favour 'Environmental noise'. I would say that the term environmental noise encompasses Industrial noise(though I think this still warrants its own page) which is not generally regarded as pollution, and air conditioning noise, for which the term pollution doesn't really feel right. Whether to use Environmental noise or Noise (environmental) doesn't matter, as we just redirect from the other name. I prefer Noise (environmental) to emphasise the common feature in the list of branch pages, and this seems to be done a lot on Wikipedia. Note the ease of navigating noise topics, whatever their name, using the navigation offered by the Root page concept. -- Lindosland 14:30, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
No good idea - see this new article -- Fmrauch ( talk) 13:24, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Environmental noise has a special meaning in Europe and should not be merged with noise pollution, even if there are many connections between these words. -- Fmrauch ( talk) 21:39, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
this article is about environmental noise as it is defined in Europe AND about noise regulation in Europe. It's no good idea to mix this content with other articles, because there are analog differences like Noise mitigation, Noise pollution, Noise regulation etc. -- Fmrauch ( talk) 22:12, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Environmental noise. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:24, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 03:06, 21 October 2018 (UTC)