This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Yes, there's a bit of shoehorning going on, but it does serve to demonstrate the lopsided nature of this article. The background information is way too much. A lot of this info is covered in those articles' pages. Only content relevant to this case should be in this article. -- MZMcBride ( talk) 02:03, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for helping to edit our article! Where would you suggest to add more info to in order to make the article more well-rounded and less lopsided? Ymauricia ( talk) 23:09, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
I think it is a well organized and extremely thorough article, you both obviously put a lot of work into this, great job!! ElleJean 18:50, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
You both did an impeccable job laying out the elements of this case in a thoughtful way. The "significance" portion explained why the case was relevant and what sort of precedent was set by it, which helped me to organize my thoughts while reading through the facts. rrosa3005 22:45, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
This article has recently been edited by students as part of their course work for a university course. As part of the quality metrics for the education program, we would like to determine what level of burden is placed on Wikipedia's editors by student coursework.
If you are an editor of this article who spent time correcting edits to it made by the students, please tell us how much time you spent on cleaning up the article. Please note that we are asking you to estimate only the negative effects of the students' work. If the students added good material but you spent time formatting it or making it conform to the manual of style, or copyediting it, then the material added was still a net benefit, and the work you did improved it further. If on the other hand the students added material that had to be removed, or removed good material which you had to replace, please let us know how much time you had to spend making those corrections. This includes time you may have spent posting to the students' talk pages, or to Wikipedia noticeboards, or working with them on IRC, or any other time you spent which was required to fix problems created by the students' edits. Any work you did as a Wikipedia Ambassador for that student's class should not be counted.
Please rate the amount of time spent as follows:
Please also add any comments you feel may be helpful. We welcome ratings from multiple editors on the same article. Add your input here. Thanks! -- LiAnna Davis (WMF) ( talk) 20:52, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
This article is the subject of an educational assignment at University of San Francisco supported by WikiProject United States Public Policy and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2012 Q1 term. Further details are available on the course page.
The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}}
by
PrimeBOT (
talk) on
16:55, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Yes, there's a bit of shoehorning going on, but it does serve to demonstrate the lopsided nature of this article. The background information is way too much. A lot of this info is covered in those articles' pages. Only content relevant to this case should be in this article. -- MZMcBride ( talk) 02:03, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for helping to edit our article! Where would you suggest to add more info to in order to make the article more well-rounded and less lopsided? Ymauricia ( talk) 23:09, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
I think it is a well organized and extremely thorough article, you both obviously put a lot of work into this, great job!! ElleJean 18:50, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
You both did an impeccable job laying out the elements of this case in a thoughtful way. The "significance" portion explained why the case was relevant and what sort of precedent was set by it, which helped me to organize my thoughts while reading through the facts. rrosa3005 22:45, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
This article has recently been edited by students as part of their course work for a university course. As part of the quality metrics for the education program, we would like to determine what level of burden is placed on Wikipedia's editors by student coursework.
If you are an editor of this article who spent time correcting edits to it made by the students, please tell us how much time you spent on cleaning up the article. Please note that we are asking you to estimate only the negative effects of the students' work. If the students added good material but you spent time formatting it or making it conform to the manual of style, or copyediting it, then the material added was still a net benefit, and the work you did improved it further. If on the other hand the students added material that had to be removed, or removed good material which you had to replace, please let us know how much time you had to spend making those corrections. This includes time you may have spent posting to the students' talk pages, or to Wikipedia noticeboards, or working with them on IRC, or any other time you spent which was required to fix problems created by the students' edits. Any work you did as a Wikipedia Ambassador for that student's class should not be counted.
Please rate the amount of time spent as follows:
Please also add any comments you feel may be helpful. We welcome ratings from multiple editors on the same article. Add your input here. Thanks! -- LiAnna Davis (WMF) ( talk) 20:52, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
This article is the subject of an educational assignment at University of San Francisco supported by WikiProject United States Public Policy and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2012 Q1 term. Further details are available on the course page.
The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}}
by
PrimeBOT (
talk) on
16:55, 2 January 2023 (UTC)