This article was nominated for deletion on 23 November 2019. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Law This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Australia: Law Low‑importance Ensuring Integrity Bill is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Australian law (assessed as Low-importance). Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian What's this? at the National Library of Australia. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance. Organized Labour Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

We need some sources explaining what the bill is intended to do. Asking our readers to analyse legislation or to accept it at face value is a big ask. The language "dole out punishment" seems odd. -- Pete ( talk) 20:55, 11 November 2019 (UTC) reply

I note that somebody restored the claim that the bill was "widely criticized" without supplying any sources that actually supported this claim. We can't synthesise statements; we need a reliable source to make the statement. -- Pete ( talk) 09:31, 14 November 2019 (UTC) reply