This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image:Coat arms Tunisia.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:26, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
Ennahdha Party is rather more than a "rather common misspelling". It is the name the party uses for itself in English [1] and its URL uses nahdha, though the BBC uses Ennahda [2] -- Rumping ( talk) 21:56, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
Should this redirect to Ennahdha Party , given the comment above? If not, does this translate better to 'renaissance' or to 're-birth'? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.223.13.73 ( talk) 11:22, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Moved to Ennahda Movement by RJFF. Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 19:28, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
Renaissance Party → Renaissance Movement – In Arabic, it is Harakat an-Nahda, not Hizb an-Nahda (see Ettajdid Movement). Therefore, Renaissance Movement seems like a more appropriate name. — ABJIKLAM ( t · c) 23:30, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
Citation 24: "^ a b "TUNISIA: POLITICAL PARTIES, UNKNOWN TO 61% OF TUNISIANS - ANSAmed". ANSAMED.info. Retrieved 2011-10-26." seems to have moved, I'm unaware of how to edit the reference which shows up as a reflist to me when I attempt to change it, here is a new link to the same article: http://www.ansamed.biz/en/tunisia/news/ME.XEF02959.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jackriter ( talk • contribs) 04:38, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
According to this, this, this and this, Ennahda no longer defines itself as an Islamist party, but rather a "conservative" or even a " Muslim democrat" party, in a similar fashion to the Turkish AK Party, I assume.
I think this should replace the "Islamist" label in the article; in other words, a major revision of the whole article is needed. Though, of course we should include that the party was Islamist until 2016.
Μαρκος Δ ( talk) 21:23, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Ennahda Movement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:18, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Ennahda Movement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:14, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ennahda Movement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:14, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
It was proposed in this section that
Ennahdha Movement be
renamed and moved to
Ennahda Movement.
result: Links:
current log •
target log
This is template {{
subst:Requested move/end}} |
Ennahdha Movement → Ennahda Movement – Unfortunately, the page was moved without discussion, at the supposedly uncontroversial technical request of User:HapHaxion. The reason was that this were the "official spelling used by the party". However, the Wikipedia policy for article titles does not necessarily prefer official names. Instead, the policy is to use the most common name of the subject used in independent, reliable English-language sources. Both in news media and in academic publications, the prevalent spelling is "Ennahda", without 'h' after the 'd'. See e.g. Google News, Books, Scholar. Therefore, the move should be undone. RJFF ( talk) 17:05, 4 March 2020 (UTC) —Relisting. BegbertBiggs ( talk) 20:37, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. No objections in nearly a month. ( closed by non-admin page mover) Mdewman6 ( talk) 21:21, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
Ennahda Movement → Ennahda – I don't see much reason to include movement in the title. See [3] and [4] for example. The French wiki has Ennahda without movement. Thepharoah17 ( talk) 23:34, 27 July 2021 (UTC) — Relisting. Bada Kaji ( talk • श्रीमान् गम्भीर) 15:27, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image:Coat arms Tunisia.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:26, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
Ennahdha Party is rather more than a "rather common misspelling". It is the name the party uses for itself in English [1] and its URL uses nahdha, though the BBC uses Ennahda [2] -- Rumping ( talk) 21:56, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
Should this redirect to Ennahdha Party , given the comment above? If not, does this translate better to 'renaissance' or to 're-birth'? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.223.13.73 ( talk) 11:22, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Moved to Ennahda Movement by RJFF. Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 19:28, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
Renaissance Party → Renaissance Movement – In Arabic, it is Harakat an-Nahda, not Hizb an-Nahda (see Ettajdid Movement). Therefore, Renaissance Movement seems like a more appropriate name. — ABJIKLAM ( t · c) 23:30, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
Citation 24: "^ a b "TUNISIA: POLITICAL PARTIES, UNKNOWN TO 61% OF TUNISIANS - ANSAmed". ANSAMED.info. Retrieved 2011-10-26." seems to have moved, I'm unaware of how to edit the reference which shows up as a reflist to me when I attempt to change it, here is a new link to the same article: http://www.ansamed.biz/en/tunisia/news/ME.XEF02959.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jackriter ( talk • contribs) 04:38, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
According to this, this, this and this, Ennahda no longer defines itself as an Islamist party, but rather a "conservative" or even a " Muslim democrat" party, in a similar fashion to the Turkish AK Party, I assume.
I think this should replace the "Islamist" label in the article; in other words, a major revision of the whole article is needed. Though, of course we should include that the party was Islamist until 2016.
Μαρκος Δ ( talk) 21:23, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Ennahda Movement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:18, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Ennahda Movement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:14, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ennahda Movement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:14, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
It was proposed in this section that
Ennahdha Movement be
renamed and moved to
Ennahda Movement.
result: Links:
current log •
target log
This is template {{
subst:Requested move/end}} |
Ennahdha Movement → Ennahda Movement – Unfortunately, the page was moved without discussion, at the supposedly uncontroversial technical request of User:HapHaxion. The reason was that this were the "official spelling used by the party". However, the Wikipedia policy for article titles does not necessarily prefer official names. Instead, the policy is to use the most common name of the subject used in independent, reliable English-language sources. Both in news media and in academic publications, the prevalent spelling is "Ennahda", without 'h' after the 'd'. See e.g. Google News, Books, Scholar. Therefore, the move should be undone. RJFF ( talk) 17:05, 4 March 2020 (UTC) —Relisting. BegbertBiggs ( talk) 20:37, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. No objections in nearly a month. ( closed by non-admin page mover) Mdewman6 ( talk) 21:21, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
Ennahda Movement → Ennahda – I don't see much reason to include movement in the title. See [3] and [4] for example. The French wiki has Ennahda without movement. Thepharoah17 ( talk) 23:34, 27 July 2021 (UTC) — Relisting. Bada Kaji ( talk • श्रीमान् गम्भीर) 15:27, 24 August 2021 (UTC)