This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Enjoy Yourself (Pop Smoke song) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Enjoy Yourself (Pop Smoke song). Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Enjoy Yourself (Pop Smoke song) at the Reference desk. |
Enjoy Yourself (Pop Smoke song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Drmies ( talk · contribs) 14:30, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
So, there's a lot of these little things that just need work before this can be a GA. I'm not saying it can't be--but I'll also add that I won't review the whole thing, since that's out of my league. What is in my league is GA writing, so if I were you I'd do the best I can on that and then ask for/find a reviewer who knows modern pop songs and all that. Binksternet is my go-to editor for pop, but I don't know if he's interested in reviewing; he might have some tips, though. Thanks, and good luck, Drmies ( talk) 22:57, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
I was pinged, so here I am. The writing is clumsy in this article, not "clear and concise" per Wikipedia:Good article criteria. I see that Burna Boy and the so-called remix ( really the original version) are not mentioned in the lead section, which needs to happen. The song was explicitly called Latin trap by the Independent, but Rolling Stone was not so explicit in naming the genre as R&B – they said it was "R&B-inflected" which means R&B was an influence or element of the song. I think R&B must be removed from the infobox and from statements of the song's genre. Rolling Stone can be cited saying the song was one of several on the album with R&B influences. Binksternet ( talk) 23:32, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: K. Peake ( talk · contribs) 08:35, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
During this review, I'll check the previous one to ensure no concerns from that are still in existence. -- K. Peake 08:35, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Not done I think the release info should be put first.
Don't you mean Karol G?
Not done it's important to introduce who the people are, even in the lead.
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Enjoy Yourself (Pop Smoke song) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Enjoy Yourself (Pop Smoke song). Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Enjoy Yourself (Pop Smoke song) at the Reference desk. |
Enjoy Yourself (Pop Smoke song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Drmies ( talk · contribs) 14:30, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
So, there's a lot of these little things that just need work before this can be a GA. I'm not saying it can't be--but I'll also add that I won't review the whole thing, since that's out of my league. What is in my league is GA writing, so if I were you I'd do the best I can on that and then ask for/find a reviewer who knows modern pop songs and all that. Binksternet is my go-to editor for pop, but I don't know if he's interested in reviewing; he might have some tips, though. Thanks, and good luck, Drmies ( talk) 22:57, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
I was pinged, so here I am. The writing is clumsy in this article, not "clear and concise" per Wikipedia:Good article criteria. I see that Burna Boy and the so-called remix ( really the original version) are not mentioned in the lead section, which needs to happen. The song was explicitly called Latin trap by the Independent, but Rolling Stone was not so explicit in naming the genre as R&B – they said it was "R&B-inflected" which means R&B was an influence or element of the song. I think R&B must be removed from the infobox and from statements of the song's genre. Rolling Stone can be cited saying the song was one of several on the album with R&B influences. Binksternet ( talk) 23:32, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: K. Peake ( talk · contribs) 08:35, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
During this review, I'll check the previous one to ensure no concerns from that are still in existence. -- K. Peake 08:35, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Not done I think the release info should be put first.
Don't you mean Karol G?
Not done it's important to introduce who the people are, even in the lead.