This
level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of an educational assignment that ended on 15 May 2018. |
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Ye348.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 20:37, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Potential red link fixers: Many of the analysis techniques are described in various articles. You be the judge of whether separate articles are needed for each. 129.237.114.171 15:10, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
I think that it is easy for me to get an general idea about what the engineering economics is about when reading though the page with diagram shown there.The references are good from various sources.— HKK123 ( talk) 17:23, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
- Kjt291 ( talk) 07:26, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
Think it should be subsections & related information in a specific subheading throughout the passage. Other than that, the article is great! MarquisJohnHall ( talk) 23:55, 28 April 2018 (UTC)MarquisJohnHall
The addition of the "Examples of Usage" section helps viewers understand the extent of engineering economy and the useful information and formulas that can be derived from its discipline. Each section is important to not only engineers in a manufacturing environment, but also general operations managers and productions personnel. Capital usage is also crucial to business and its conduct, no matter the scope of the operation or the money involved. Further, engineers ought to understand the principles of capital management, as it is integral to manufacturing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robert von Metternich ( talk • contribs) 17:18, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
I am not sure of the extent of the separation between civil and general engineering in the capital aspect, barring public projects. A separate page that is linked in this one may indeed be helpful to those for a more detailed version of capital management in a civil engineering situation. As for the history, I am sure that would be interesting, and no doubt worthy of being added. To see the evolution of engineering economics over centuries would allow the viewer to appreciate the scope of the material in question. -- Robert von Metternich ( talk) 01:49, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
This
level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of an educational assignment that ended on 15 May 2018. |
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Ye348.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 20:37, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Potential red link fixers: Many of the analysis techniques are described in various articles. You be the judge of whether separate articles are needed for each. 129.237.114.171 15:10, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
I think that it is easy for me to get an general idea about what the engineering economics is about when reading though the page with diagram shown there.The references are good from various sources.— HKK123 ( talk) 17:23, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
- Kjt291 ( talk) 07:26, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
Think it should be subsections & related information in a specific subheading throughout the passage. Other than that, the article is great! MarquisJohnHall ( talk) 23:55, 28 April 2018 (UTC)MarquisJohnHall
The addition of the "Examples of Usage" section helps viewers understand the extent of engineering economy and the useful information and formulas that can be derived from its discipline. Each section is important to not only engineers in a manufacturing environment, but also general operations managers and productions personnel. Capital usage is also crucial to business and its conduct, no matter the scope of the operation or the money involved. Further, engineers ought to understand the principles of capital management, as it is integral to manufacturing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robert von Metternich ( talk • contribs) 17:18, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
I am not sure of the extent of the separation between civil and general engineering in the capital aspect, barring public projects. A separate page that is linked in this one may indeed be helpful to those for a more detailed version of capital management in a civil engineering situation. As for the history, I am sure that would be interesting, and no doubt worthy of being added. To see the evolution of engineering economics over centuries would allow the viewer to appreciate the scope of the material in question. -- Robert von Metternich ( talk) 01:49, 3 May 2018 (UTC)