![]() | This article was nominated for
deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page seems to focus on nation wide engineering traditions rather than those of the UBC EUS in particular. Is there a "Canadian Engineering" page of some sort were most of this stuff would be better in? TastyCakes 04:16, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
Further to my comments on the deletion proposal, I think that this article requires a complete rewrite to focus on the UBC EUS, rather than on engineering traditions in general. The information currently on the article is (for the most part) valuable, but not in this context. The material on the ring would fit on such a "Canadian Engineering" page, while the part about the pub could be pared down substantially. I'd like to see (and would be happy to work on) an article that outlines the history, traditions, and notoriety of the EUS. Ckatz 04:48, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
I moved the stuff I thought was unrelated to the EUS in particular to Engineering traditions in Canada. Some of it will probably have to be removed even from there. TastyCakes 21:00, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
How can this article be up for renomination for deletion? I checked wikipedias polcies Deletion_policy#Limitations_on_renominationand renominating this does not follow these policies. ryanc 20:32, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
Is there any reason I cannot have a list of past presidents? There is one on the Alma Mater Society of UBC. Since the EUS is strongly based on history and tradition, I think it's a good idea to do this. I know wikipedia is not a directory, but that's not the intent of this. ryanc 20:17, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
"Is there any reason I cannot have a list of past presidents?" Yes, WP:NOT#DIR if the EUS needs a wiki page to archive its history they should sent up their own wiki site. Could even move the Handbuk there etc. Regardless, wikipedia is not a directory WP:NOT#DIR because all article must be noteable WP:NOT. Shadesofgrey 07:04, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
Is it just me or is most of this article a copyvio from here?? I'll avoid posting a {{ copyvio}} notice on the article space for a few day, because of recent activity, but you need to write our own material!! Good luck. Andrewjur e n(talk) 06:49, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
Does it matter that I have control over the content on that website? ryanc 17:05, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
Please note, comments like "This organization can, and will, evolve to meet the needs of today's student" are not encyclopedic. Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Andrewjur e n(talk) 06:53, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
Hey Ryan, you say on the deletion nomination page that you have a list of previous stunts done by the EUS. Do you think you could put a more comprehensive list of these on the site with dates? I think that would go a long way in making people think the article is notable. TastyCakes 07:32, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
STUdeNT projectS include, are rumoured to have included the following.
Don't move any of this content to article w/o corroboration from yearbook, personal account, newspaper (eg. Sun or Ubyssey) and the like. Diligent researchers will look for records of these stunts. They usually occured in Feb. Shadesofgrey 05:00, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
![]() | This article was nominated for
deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page seems to focus on nation wide engineering traditions rather than those of the UBC EUS in particular. Is there a "Canadian Engineering" page of some sort were most of this stuff would be better in? TastyCakes 04:16, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
Further to my comments on the deletion proposal, I think that this article requires a complete rewrite to focus on the UBC EUS, rather than on engineering traditions in general. The information currently on the article is (for the most part) valuable, but not in this context. The material on the ring would fit on such a "Canadian Engineering" page, while the part about the pub could be pared down substantially. I'd like to see (and would be happy to work on) an article that outlines the history, traditions, and notoriety of the EUS. Ckatz 04:48, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
I moved the stuff I thought was unrelated to the EUS in particular to Engineering traditions in Canada. Some of it will probably have to be removed even from there. TastyCakes 21:00, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
How can this article be up for renomination for deletion? I checked wikipedias polcies Deletion_policy#Limitations_on_renominationand renominating this does not follow these policies. ryanc 20:32, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
Is there any reason I cannot have a list of past presidents? There is one on the Alma Mater Society of UBC. Since the EUS is strongly based on history and tradition, I think it's a good idea to do this. I know wikipedia is not a directory, but that's not the intent of this. ryanc 20:17, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
"Is there any reason I cannot have a list of past presidents?" Yes, WP:NOT#DIR if the EUS needs a wiki page to archive its history they should sent up their own wiki site. Could even move the Handbuk there etc. Regardless, wikipedia is not a directory WP:NOT#DIR because all article must be noteable WP:NOT. Shadesofgrey 07:04, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
Is it just me or is most of this article a copyvio from here?? I'll avoid posting a {{ copyvio}} notice on the article space for a few day, because of recent activity, but you need to write our own material!! Good luck. Andrewjur e n(talk) 06:49, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
Does it matter that I have control over the content on that website? ryanc 17:05, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
Please note, comments like "This organization can, and will, evolve to meet the needs of today's student" are not encyclopedic. Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Andrewjur e n(talk) 06:53, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
Hey Ryan, you say on the deletion nomination page that you have a list of previous stunts done by the EUS. Do you think you could put a more comprehensive list of these on the site with dates? I think that would go a long way in making people think the article is notable. TastyCakes 07:32, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
STUdeNT projectS include, are rumoured to have included the following.
Don't move any of this content to article w/o corroboration from yearbook, personal account, newspaper (eg. Sun or Ubyssey) and the like. Diligent researchers will look for records of these stunts. They usually occured in Feb. Shadesofgrey 05:00, 12 April 2007 (UTC)