This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Syracuse University supported by WikiProject United States Public Policy and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Spring term. Further details are available on the course page.
Above message substituted from {{WAP assignment}}
on 15:33, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Georgia Gwinnett College supported by the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2012 Q1 term. Further details are available on the course page.
Above message substituted from {{WAP assignment}}
on 15:33, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
I removed [[Category:Government of the United States]] from this page as this is not a formal government agency, branch or department. This Government of the U.S. cat is for institutions of the government.
Epolk 22:19, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
Much of said appearance would be greatly alleviated if the reader were directed to the original source. The link below will get you there.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/energy/
67.128.169.97 19:50, 30 June 2006 (UTC)Don Granberry.
Does anybody have pictures of the Energy Task Force ?
Thank you, J23yrne —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Special:Contributions/24.186.190.145 ( talk) 15:34, August 20, 2007 (UTC)
This aricle stands as a benchmark example of ideologs in 'acamedia' (secular progressives) taking over how an issue is defined and the Wikipedia fairness doctrine is violated...viz: "people report, possible corruption, etc." indeed! A major offense to the encyclopedic project and revolting to witness the denial that the approach 'smacks' of any bias. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.246.65.114 ( talk) 17:43, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
I am a student at GGC. As part of my course project, I plan to make a few changes to make this article better. Undoubtedly, the page is not neutral. I also feel that it is very dull, as it has no images, or any other illustrations. I feel that the quotes given needs to be paraphrased and cited properly. I also would like to add other industrialized countries that have a similar task force and how their strategy is working for them. I feel it would be nice to have U.S strategies compared to other countries. If there is something that I do that does not follow Wikipedia's guidelines, I will gladly take the constructive criticism and try to make it better. I41hope ( talk) 02:10, 22 February 2012 (UTC) i41hope
I flagged the Controversy section of this article for POV dispute. I did some editing of the section, to clean up some of its language, fix some of its references, and remove speculatory remarks. Some of the contents still seems accusatory and may not really indicate controversy (for instance - the frequent use of the phrase "big oil companies", also mentioning "energy companies" and "energy industry" as if somehow it was controversial for energy industry representatives to meet with an energy task force designed to investigate energy industry needs). As well, when I happened upon the article, some of the references and cross-references were actually hard-links to Center for American Progress articles which were explicitly partisan. I think that I cleaned it up pretty well, but I need a fresh set of eyes on this, to establish it's neutrality. Thegeniusboy05 ( talk) 16:17, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
One other point - unless I am mistaken, I believe that Wikipedia advises against putting "Controversy" segments in articles like this. Thegeniusboy05 ( talk) 16:19, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Energy Task Force. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 03:58, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Energy Task Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:55, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Syracuse University supported by WikiProject United States Public Policy and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Spring term. Further details are available on the course page.
Above message substituted from {{WAP assignment}}
on 15:33, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Georgia Gwinnett College supported by the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2012 Q1 term. Further details are available on the course page.
Above message substituted from {{WAP assignment}}
on 15:33, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
I removed [[Category:Government of the United States]] from this page as this is not a formal government agency, branch or department. This Government of the U.S. cat is for institutions of the government.
Epolk 22:19, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
Much of said appearance would be greatly alleviated if the reader were directed to the original source. The link below will get you there.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/energy/
67.128.169.97 19:50, 30 June 2006 (UTC)Don Granberry.
Does anybody have pictures of the Energy Task Force ?
Thank you, J23yrne —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Special:Contributions/24.186.190.145 ( talk) 15:34, August 20, 2007 (UTC)
This aricle stands as a benchmark example of ideologs in 'acamedia' (secular progressives) taking over how an issue is defined and the Wikipedia fairness doctrine is violated...viz: "people report, possible corruption, etc." indeed! A major offense to the encyclopedic project and revolting to witness the denial that the approach 'smacks' of any bias. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.246.65.114 ( talk) 17:43, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
I am a student at GGC. As part of my course project, I plan to make a few changes to make this article better. Undoubtedly, the page is not neutral. I also feel that it is very dull, as it has no images, or any other illustrations. I feel that the quotes given needs to be paraphrased and cited properly. I also would like to add other industrialized countries that have a similar task force and how their strategy is working for them. I feel it would be nice to have U.S strategies compared to other countries. If there is something that I do that does not follow Wikipedia's guidelines, I will gladly take the constructive criticism and try to make it better. I41hope ( talk) 02:10, 22 February 2012 (UTC) i41hope
I flagged the Controversy section of this article for POV dispute. I did some editing of the section, to clean up some of its language, fix some of its references, and remove speculatory remarks. Some of the contents still seems accusatory and may not really indicate controversy (for instance - the frequent use of the phrase "big oil companies", also mentioning "energy companies" and "energy industry" as if somehow it was controversial for energy industry representatives to meet with an energy task force designed to investigate energy industry needs). As well, when I happened upon the article, some of the references and cross-references were actually hard-links to Center for American Progress articles which were explicitly partisan. I think that I cleaned it up pretty well, but I need a fresh set of eyes on this, to establish it's neutrality. Thegeniusboy05 ( talk) 16:17, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
One other point - unless I am mistaken, I believe that Wikipedia advises against putting "Controversy" segments in articles like this. Thegeniusboy05 ( talk) 16:19, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Energy Task Force. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 03:58, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Energy Task Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:55, 21 December 2017 (UTC)