This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Eneloop article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
This reads like a press release, including typos. 82.113.99.10 ( talk) 21:29, 30 October 2011 (UTC) Martin Jost of martinJost.eu
I think the Eneloop Pro (2,400mAh) is called Double X in Europe and is different from the XX Powered by Eneloop (2,500mAh XX series). But could be confusion between different marketing in different countries. Engadget Eneloop Pro
I haven't seen any information about eneloops in C or D format (other than the adapters) aside from in this article, which claims that these formats are available in Japan - however the link is dead. Can someone update this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.12.250.153 ( talk) 00:52, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Manual of Style says that all-lowercase trademarks, such as eneloop, should always be capitalized (i.e. written as Eneloop) when used in Wikipedia. I wonder if someone could please fix the article so that the article matches the Manual of Style and the rest of Wikipedia? Kind regards, — Unforgettableid ( talk) 01:57, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
I was not sure how you pronounce Eneloop (een-loop, en-loop or any-loop, etc.)... This would be helpful IMHO. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.200.159.60 ( talk) 04:21, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Everywhere I look i says that rebranded Lite version can be recharged about 3000 times, not 5000. 83.6.200.192 ( talk) 13:27, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
Rechargeable up to 3000 times
eneloop lite is rechargeable up to 3000 times, which makes it even more economically and environment-friendly. By reducing the amount of materials used, attractive prices have been realized.
This article needs to mention the differences in Eneloops since the Panasonic purchase. The newer chinese version seem to be quite inferior compared to the Japanese versions. I've had a look at the Edit history and their appears to be an edit war going on regarding the Fujitsu/FDK details. From what I can tell the newer eneloops are just Eneloops by name only and the original Japanese manufactured Eneloops are now Fujitsu (and other rebranded) brand ones.
From this forum: "It's speculated that when Panasonic purchased Sanyo, they only acquired the Eneloop brand and the Japanese factory that produces Eneloops was sold off to a third party to ensure that there weren't any anti-trust issues that would otherwise block the purchase due to Panasonic potentially controlling an excessive proportion of the worldwide battery production capacity. " ( http://www.candlepowerforums.com/vb/showthread.php?392229-Japanese-Vs-Chinese-Eneloop-Cycle-Testing-Results)auhsor 03:37, 23 March 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Auhsor ( talk • contribs)
I think Wh is amp hours * volts (volts will drop as battery drains)
The tables confuse me for example AA
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on
Eneloop. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 15:56, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Eneloop. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:43, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
According to this article the 1st generation is marked HR-3UTG, and 3rd generation is marked HR-3UTGB, mine are marked Sanyo HR-3UTGA, min 1900 mAh, made in Japan. I assume they are 2nd generation, don't know when I bought them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:908:1865:3140:2160:F1F7:8B9D:24D7 ( talk) 11:01, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
I don't know if this can go in the article without being considered Original Research, but looking at the total energy delivered by Eneloops and Eneloop Lites, the figure is the same (~2100Wh for AAA size). So, if used to provide steady low power (DECT phone), they will both have the same lifespan - the Lites will have to be charged more frequently if allowed to discharge completely, but this will be exactly compensated for by the larger number of cycles (3000 vs 2000). The non-Lites will let you leave the phone off the hook for a few more days before needing to recharge (longer endurance), but if you always charge overnight they will behave exactly the same, with the Lites doing so more cheaply. Best wishes, Pol098 ( talk) 16:53, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
Newest packages all have minimal (not typical) at 2500 mAh. That was CC generation. CD generation has min. 2550 mAh. 109.252.166.131 ( talk) 00:20, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Eneloop article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
This reads like a press release, including typos. 82.113.99.10 ( talk) 21:29, 30 October 2011 (UTC) Martin Jost of martinJost.eu
I think the Eneloop Pro (2,400mAh) is called Double X in Europe and is different from the XX Powered by Eneloop (2,500mAh XX series). But could be confusion between different marketing in different countries. Engadget Eneloop Pro
I haven't seen any information about eneloops in C or D format (other than the adapters) aside from in this article, which claims that these formats are available in Japan - however the link is dead. Can someone update this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.12.250.153 ( talk) 00:52, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Manual of Style says that all-lowercase trademarks, such as eneloop, should always be capitalized (i.e. written as Eneloop) when used in Wikipedia. I wonder if someone could please fix the article so that the article matches the Manual of Style and the rest of Wikipedia? Kind regards, — Unforgettableid ( talk) 01:57, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
I was not sure how you pronounce Eneloop (een-loop, en-loop or any-loop, etc.)... This would be helpful IMHO. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.200.159.60 ( talk) 04:21, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Everywhere I look i says that rebranded Lite version can be recharged about 3000 times, not 5000. 83.6.200.192 ( talk) 13:27, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
Rechargeable up to 3000 times
eneloop lite is rechargeable up to 3000 times, which makes it even more economically and environment-friendly. By reducing the amount of materials used, attractive prices have been realized.
This article needs to mention the differences in Eneloops since the Panasonic purchase. The newer chinese version seem to be quite inferior compared to the Japanese versions. I've had a look at the Edit history and their appears to be an edit war going on regarding the Fujitsu/FDK details. From what I can tell the newer eneloops are just Eneloops by name only and the original Japanese manufactured Eneloops are now Fujitsu (and other rebranded) brand ones.
From this forum: "It's speculated that when Panasonic purchased Sanyo, they only acquired the Eneloop brand and the Japanese factory that produces Eneloops was sold off to a third party to ensure that there weren't any anti-trust issues that would otherwise block the purchase due to Panasonic potentially controlling an excessive proportion of the worldwide battery production capacity. " ( http://www.candlepowerforums.com/vb/showthread.php?392229-Japanese-Vs-Chinese-Eneloop-Cycle-Testing-Results)auhsor 03:37, 23 March 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Auhsor ( talk • contribs)
I think Wh is amp hours * volts (volts will drop as battery drains)
The tables confuse me for example AA
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on
Eneloop. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 15:56, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Eneloop. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:43, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
According to this article the 1st generation is marked HR-3UTG, and 3rd generation is marked HR-3UTGB, mine are marked Sanyo HR-3UTGA, min 1900 mAh, made in Japan. I assume they are 2nd generation, don't know when I bought them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:908:1865:3140:2160:F1F7:8B9D:24D7 ( talk) 11:01, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
I don't know if this can go in the article without being considered Original Research, but looking at the total energy delivered by Eneloops and Eneloop Lites, the figure is the same (~2100Wh for AAA size). So, if used to provide steady low power (DECT phone), they will both have the same lifespan - the Lites will have to be charged more frequently if allowed to discharge completely, but this will be exactly compensated for by the larger number of cycles (3000 vs 2000). The non-Lites will let you leave the phone off the hook for a few more days before needing to recharge (longer endurance), but if you always charge overnight they will behave exactly the same, with the Lites doing so more cheaply. Best wishes, Pol098 ( talk) 16:53, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
Newest packages all have minimal (not typical) at 2500 mAh. That was CC generation. CD generation has min. 2550 mAh. 109.252.166.131 ( talk) 00:20, 23 August 2023 (UTC)