This article was nominated for deletion on 2007-11-04. The result of the discussion was Keep.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biology Low‑importance Endogeny (biology) is part of the WikiProject Biology, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to biology on Wikipedia. Leave messages on the WikiProject talk page.BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject BiologyTemplate:WikiProject BiologyBiology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Molecular Biology: Genetics / MCB This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. This article is supported by the Genetics task force (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

I think it might be a good idea to merge this article with exogenous. Just my 2 cents.

Both articles are horrible, but expanded versions might warrant separate articles Plasticup ^T/ C 03:49, 8 October 2007 (UTC) reply

I propose to merge Exogeny into Endogeny (biology) since they cover sufficiently similar topics that they can be explained within the same context. Jamgoodman ( talk) 19:04, 26 June 2019 (UTC) reply

The title and lede are written in order to make this an article about biology. The section about the term in other fields is off-topic. This is what hatnotes are for. Wikiacc ( ¶) 03:20, 10 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Comments invited. (Pinging Jamgoodman.) Wikiacc ( ¶) 03:50, 10 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Yes, all that stuff was, with respect, rubbish, totally off-topic. All that's left is a WP:DICDEF which shouldn't be on Wikipedia either. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 19:14, 16 October 2020 (UTC) reply