This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article contains a translation of Encyclopédistes from fr.wikipedia. |
This article is stubby and incomplete, and List of contributors to the Encyclopédie has less than a bare minimum of explanatory text at the top - how about moving the list material to this article? Squiddy | (squirt ink?) 15:15, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
I am working on making it less stubby and incomplete but am new to translating wikipages. I hope I am following the guidelines appropriately. -- Evey5393 ( talk) 22:46, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
I suggest we move this to Philosophes. Thats what they called themselves. Tourskin ( talk) 06:09, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
The article currently refers to claims made by some one named Frank Kafker who doesn't seem to have earned enough interest, notoriety, credibility or fame for an article of his own, thus I think it would be appropriate to refer to the source of this claim if it is to be left in the article. Bjorn.Persson ( talk) 21:37, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
The article still has far from adequate coverage of this important intellectual undertaking, which massively influenced the course of thinking of the educated classes over the next century, and to which we owe many of our present attitudes, conventions, conveniences and institutions.
We need more factual content. For example:
yoyo ( talk) 02:18, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article contains a translation of Encyclopédistes from fr.wikipedia. |
This article is stubby and incomplete, and List of contributors to the Encyclopédie has less than a bare minimum of explanatory text at the top - how about moving the list material to this article? Squiddy | (squirt ink?) 15:15, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
I am working on making it less stubby and incomplete but am new to translating wikipages. I hope I am following the guidelines appropriately. -- Evey5393 ( talk) 22:46, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
I suggest we move this to Philosophes. Thats what they called themselves. Tourskin ( talk) 06:09, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
The article currently refers to claims made by some one named Frank Kafker who doesn't seem to have earned enough interest, notoriety, credibility or fame for an article of his own, thus I think it would be appropriate to refer to the source of this claim if it is to be left in the article. Bjorn.Persson ( talk) 21:37, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
The article still has far from adequate coverage of this important intellectual undertaking, which massively influenced the course of thinking of the educated classes over the next century, and to which we owe many of our present attitudes, conventions, conveniences and institutions.
We need more factual content. For example:
yoyo ( talk) 02:18, 13 February 2020 (UTC)