![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
JA: The following reference is via a subscription site:
JA: That is not open as I understand it. Can someone supply an open source or published equivalent? Thanks, Jon Awbrey 12:14, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
I know that empirical verification has a lot of importance when it comes to Wittgenstein's theories on language, for example. Shouldn't we expand on that? - Pat Peter 05:46, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
I propose to merge this article into Empirical research. What do you guys think? -- Hamsterlopithecus ( talk) 23:44, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
"Adding further confusion is another connotation of empiric. Strict empiricists are those who derive their rules of practice entirely from experience, to the exclusion of philosophical theory."
I have a problem with the above statement. Arn't all experiences interpreted through a worldview which involves a philosophy of some sort? Even if that person isn't aware of the underlying philosophy and presuppositions, nonetheless that person applies them.
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
JA: The following reference is via a subscription site:
JA: That is not open as I understand it. Can someone supply an open source or published equivalent? Thanks, Jon Awbrey 12:14, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
I know that empirical verification has a lot of importance when it comes to Wittgenstein's theories on language, for example. Shouldn't we expand on that? - Pat Peter 05:46, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
I propose to merge this article into Empirical research. What do you guys think? -- Hamsterlopithecus ( talk) 23:44, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
"Adding further confusion is another connotation of empiric. Strict empiricists are those who derive their rules of practice entirely from experience, to the exclusion of philosophical theory."
I have a problem with the above statement. Arn't all experiences interpreted through a worldview which involves a philosophy of some sort? Even if that person isn't aware of the underlying philosophy and presuppositions, nonetheless that person applies them.