From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

One source

This article currently shows 137 different refs, of which 90%? are one book separated into individual refs by page for each individual statement made in the article. This needs to be cleaned up using ref names, at the very least for the instances where the same page is being used 3 or more times. My suggestion would be that the book as a whole is used as a single ref (ref name="Meed"), especially if we can find an online copy to provide verifiability for the statements made. We also need to add some additional sources (other books, articles, etc.) to verify (backup) the single source we are currently using. - Adolphus79 ( talk) 20:07, 21 March 2023 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

One source

This article currently shows 137 different refs, of which 90%? are one book separated into individual refs by page for each individual statement made in the article. This needs to be cleaned up using ref names, at the very least for the instances where the same page is being used 3 or more times. My suggestion would be that the book as a whole is used as a single ref (ref name="Meed"), especially if we can find an online copy to provide verifiability for the statements made. We also need to add some additional sources (other books, articles, etc.) to verify (backup) the single source we are currently using. - Adolphus79 ( talk) 20:07, 21 March 2023 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook