This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Hong Kong Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Hong Kong To-do: history watch purge Attention needed (60) ...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (25) Collaboration needed Recommend topic Improvement needed GA-Class articles (58) • B-Class articles (284) Cleanup needed C-Class articles (998) Image needed (344) Destub needed Start-Class articles (5,345) • Stub-Class articles (6,691) Deorphan needed ...orphans Page creation needed Requested articles Miscellaneous tasks ...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (403) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,260) Medicine: Emergency Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Emergency medicine and EMS task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

One assessment comment: The images under "Land ambulances" might be better arranged in a horizontal gallery. Having an image where the reader expects to find the first word of a new section is officially deprecated. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 18:35, 25 September 2008 (UTC

Done...and you're absolutely right! It looks a lot better. Thanks for the 'pointer'! Emrgmgmtca ( talk) 20:12, 25 September 2008 (UTC) reply