![]() | Emeco 1006 has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: August 4, 2015. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view.
|
I've been working on some Emeco-related content for Wikipedia that I think is more neutral/less promotional, more comprehensive, better-sourced and contains freely licensed images. The drafts I hammered out are located at User:CorporateM/Emeco 1006 (on the chair) and User:CorporateM/Emeco (on the manufacturer).
There was previously an Emeco company article that was (quite rightfully) deleted by @ Y: as an advert (I didn't write that) and I was hoping to prompt a discussion on whether a neutral version should be restored or if information about the company should be consolidated here on the chair article as a sub-section. I believe the articles should be consolidated per WP:ORGVANITY, however my past experiences have been that there is not necessarily strong consensus for WP:ORGVANITY, which is part of an essay I wrote that emphasizes consolidation. You can see what a separate stub article on the Emeco company would look like here.
I also wanted to ping @ Crisco 1492: and @ Sandstein: who participated on the page previously and remind anyone that doesn't know that I have a financial connection with Emeco. CorporateM ( Talk) 17:35, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Based on @ Cullen328:'s comment above, I've added an AFC submission to the draft article on Emeco and am requesting that this draft of this article on the 1006 chair be considered as a much more up-to-date, well-sourced, neutral, illustrated, and comprehensive replacement of the current. A couple minor notes about the draft:
CorporateM ( Talk) 16:02, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Below are a few requested corrections, tweaks and misc items. Suggested additions are in bold and trims in strikeout, etc. to indicate the proposed edits.
David King, Ethical Wiki (
Talk) 23:15, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
References
References
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Per the discussion above, the 111 chair is clearly identified as being inspired by the 1006 Navy Chair this article is about, but many of the other chairs are not clearly identified in the sources as to whether they are 1006-inspired or relevant to this article in any other way. I conducted some blatant original research (terrible I know) and asked Emeco which chairs they felt were 1006 inspired and which have nothing to do with the 1006. I then cross-checked their list against the chairs that are notable enough such that they are mentioned here and looked at some photos. The following chairs if you look at the photos I've linked to, they are obviously not relevant to the 1006 chair this article is about and I suggest moving any content about these chairs on this page to the article about the general company at Emeco
Also, there seemed to be pretty strong consensus to add the following if anyone doesn't mind throwing it in:
David King, Ethical Wiki ( Talk) 23:17, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
Unrelated chairs removed
|
---|
An Emeco 2006 chair was introduced in the year 2006, in collaboration with British architect Norman Foster, and the company continued to collaborate with other designers. [3] [4] [5] The Broom product line was later introduced to improve the use of recyclable materials, being made of 75 percent recycled plastic and 15 percent sawdust. The remaining 10 percent of the Broom chairs is made up of colorings and mold flow enhancers. [2] The more minimalist "Superlight" chair was introduced to the line in 2004. [5] [6] |
eight
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).exactly
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).
![]() | Emeco 1006 has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: August 4, 2015. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view.
|
I've been working on some Emeco-related content for Wikipedia that I think is more neutral/less promotional, more comprehensive, better-sourced and contains freely licensed images. The drafts I hammered out are located at User:CorporateM/Emeco 1006 (on the chair) and User:CorporateM/Emeco (on the manufacturer).
There was previously an Emeco company article that was (quite rightfully) deleted by @ Y: as an advert (I didn't write that) and I was hoping to prompt a discussion on whether a neutral version should be restored or if information about the company should be consolidated here on the chair article as a sub-section. I believe the articles should be consolidated per WP:ORGVANITY, however my past experiences have been that there is not necessarily strong consensus for WP:ORGVANITY, which is part of an essay I wrote that emphasizes consolidation. You can see what a separate stub article on the Emeco company would look like here.
I also wanted to ping @ Crisco 1492: and @ Sandstein: who participated on the page previously and remind anyone that doesn't know that I have a financial connection with Emeco. CorporateM ( Talk) 17:35, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Based on @ Cullen328:'s comment above, I've added an AFC submission to the draft article on Emeco and am requesting that this draft of this article on the 1006 chair be considered as a much more up-to-date, well-sourced, neutral, illustrated, and comprehensive replacement of the current. A couple minor notes about the draft:
CorporateM ( Talk) 16:02, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Below are a few requested corrections, tweaks and misc items. Suggested additions are in bold and trims in strikeout, etc. to indicate the proposed edits.
David King, Ethical Wiki (
Talk) 23:15, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
References
References
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Per the discussion above, the 111 chair is clearly identified as being inspired by the 1006 Navy Chair this article is about, but many of the other chairs are not clearly identified in the sources as to whether they are 1006-inspired or relevant to this article in any other way. I conducted some blatant original research (terrible I know) and asked Emeco which chairs they felt were 1006 inspired and which have nothing to do with the 1006. I then cross-checked their list against the chairs that are notable enough such that they are mentioned here and looked at some photos. The following chairs if you look at the photos I've linked to, they are obviously not relevant to the 1006 chair this article is about and I suggest moving any content about these chairs on this page to the article about the general company at Emeco
Also, there seemed to be pretty strong consensus to add the following if anyone doesn't mind throwing it in:
David King, Ethical Wiki ( Talk) 23:17, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
Unrelated chairs removed
|
---|
An Emeco 2006 chair was introduced in the year 2006, in collaboration with British architect Norman Foster, and the company continued to collaborate with other designers. [3] [4] [5] The Broom product line was later introduced to improve the use of recyclable materials, being made of 75 percent recycled plastic and 15 percent sawdust. The remaining 10 percent of the Broom chairs is made up of colorings and mold flow enhancers. [2] The more minimalist "Superlight" chair was introduced to the line in 2004. [5] [6] |
eight
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).exactly
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).