This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I would go against merging since embracery is not entirely obsolete/superceded by jury tampering. There are cases where this charge is brought, even today, and there is some confusion from it.

So now we come to the embracery charge. Supposedly, this is an archaic offense with its roots in the Magna Carta. Suffice it to say that jury tampering is a bad thing. But there’s a separate offense for jury tampering. Why embracery? Who’s ever heard of embracery? "Wyatt indictment rocks election day". Retrieved 2007-11-06.

An page on this subject in entirety would be useful. B.S. Lawrence 15:34, 6 November 2007 (UTC) reply