From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Meets notability criteria.

The meets criteria 1 (multiple national media are cited in the article) and 11 ( https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/articles/2qNJsnjYFvbLrK9CZ0CfYfM/radio-2-new-music-playlist) for notability. All other Eurovision entries for the UK have an article, as do other countries' entries not sure why this is being treated so differently.-- DoctorAB ( talk) 14:59, 28 March 2021 (UTC) reply

But yeah I agree that this topic is notable. It also meets citerion 3 for songs, because it charted in the UK. ― JochemvanHees ( talk) 20:15, 28 March 2021 (UTC) reply
I say Restore this to an article now. Have charted in the UK. And is notable now. BabbaQ ( talk) 17:44, 29 March 2021 (UTC) reply
I just resubmitted it because I think notability has been demonstrated enough, but we'll see what the reviewer thinks of it. I don't think we should bypass the AfC process though, like someone attempted earlier, because it has been declined before. ― JochemvanHees ( talk) 20:33, 5 April 2021 (UTC) reply

Agree that it meets notability criteria

Reviewer here. That's it. Robert McClenon ( talk) 02:02, 8 April 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments moved from front

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Meets notability criteria.

The meets criteria 1 (multiple national media are cited in the article) and 11 ( https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/articles/2qNJsnjYFvbLrK9CZ0CfYfM/radio-2-new-music-playlist) for notability. All other Eurovision entries for the UK have an article, as do other countries' entries not sure why this is being treated so differently.-- DoctorAB ( talk) 14:59, 28 March 2021 (UTC) reply

But yeah I agree that this topic is notable. It also meets citerion 3 for songs, because it charted in the UK. ― JochemvanHees ( talk) 20:15, 28 March 2021 (UTC) reply
I say Restore this to an article now. Have charted in the UK. And is notable now. BabbaQ ( talk) 17:44, 29 March 2021 (UTC) reply
I just resubmitted it because I think notability has been demonstrated enough, but we'll see what the reviewer thinks of it. I don't think we should bypass the AfC process though, like someone attempted earlier, because it has been declined before. ― JochemvanHees ( talk) 20:33, 5 April 2021 (UTC) reply

Agree that it meets notability criteria

Reviewer here. That's it. Robert McClenon ( talk) 02:02, 8 April 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments moved from front


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook