Elmwood Tower has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
March 22, 2024. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the
Elmwood Tower may have once been the tallest building in
Omaha? | |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 21:52, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Sammi Brie ( talk · contribs) 06:59, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
This is a quickfail as I believe the page is lacking sufficient breadth. For the age of this building, Omaha World-Herald references that are older than 2014 would be a must to provide the detail level that this GA should have. You have the full-run World-Herald available to you through Newspapers.com at WP:TWL. Use it.
Some notes:
adj=on
triggered.@ Sammi Brie, thank you for the review. I've spent the last week going through Newspapers.com and Google Scholar again, making queries into both "Elmwood Tower" and "Masonic Manor". A broader search of WP:TWL was also conducted. I found some additional information, added in this diff, but have yet to find anything substantial that is missing from the article (most of what I've added is nominal and at times bordering on WP:TOOMUCH in my opinion). I'm reaching out to see if there's something that you saw during your review that I am missing in my searches. I assume you found something substantial since this quickfailed on criteria 3, and honestly I'm a little worried that something that major made it under my radar.
At this point I'm getting a bit stumped, but also recognize that my queries are far from perfect, such as when I missed one source for the GA review of Van Tran Flat Bridge and it sank the whole thing. Please get back when you can, I would love to continue improving this article but am just running out of places to look. 🏵️ Etrius ( Us) 05:46, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Grungaloo ( talk · contribs) 03:18, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Hey
Etriusus, I'm going to pick this review up. It looks like you've addressed the issues that caused the quickfail and I can't see anything that would trigger another, so I'll give this a full review. I'll ping you in a few days once my review is done!
grungaloo (
talk)
03:18, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Where a footnote applies only to material within parentheses, the ref tags belong just before the closing parenthesis., this applies to the templated info since its disputed information. I can't add a citation inside a covert template.
The building originally had 320 units, but many have been combined, and there are now 219. Last week saw only six vacancies.
Hey again Etriusus, I'm finished my review, see comments above. Feel free to reply to them inline if you'd like. If there's any questions let me know. Thanks! grungaloo ( talk) 01:16, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
PrimalMustelid
talk
03:58, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Etriusus ( talk). Self-nominated at 04:31, 8 February 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Elmwood Tower; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General eligibility:
Policy compliance:
Hook eligibility:
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Elmwood Tower has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
March 22, 2024. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the
Elmwood Tower may have once been the tallest building in
Omaha? | |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 21:52, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Sammi Brie ( talk · contribs) 06:59, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
This is a quickfail as I believe the page is lacking sufficient breadth. For the age of this building, Omaha World-Herald references that are older than 2014 would be a must to provide the detail level that this GA should have. You have the full-run World-Herald available to you through Newspapers.com at WP:TWL. Use it.
Some notes:
adj=on
triggered.@ Sammi Brie, thank you for the review. I've spent the last week going through Newspapers.com and Google Scholar again, making queries into both "Elmwood Tower" and "Masonic Manor". A broader search of WP:TWL was also conducted. I found some additional information, added in this diff, but have yet to find anything substantial that is missing from the article (most of what I've added is nominal and at times bordering on WP:TOOMUCH in my opinion). I'm reaching out to see if there's something that you saw during your review that I am missing in my searches. I assume you found something substantial since this quickfailed on criteria 3, and honestly I'm a little worried that something that major made it under my radar.
At this point I'm getting a bit stumped, but also recognize that my queries are far from perfect, such as when I missed one source for the GA review of Van Tran Flat Bridge and it sank the whole thing. Please get back when you can, I would love to continue improving this article but am just running out of places to look. 🏵️ Etrius ( Us) 05:46, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Grungaloo ( talk · contribs) 03:18, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Hey
Etriusus, I'm going to pick this review up. It looks like you've addressed the issues that caused the quickfail and I can't see anything that would trigger another, so I'll give this a full review. I'll ping you in a few days once my review is done!
grungaloo (
talk)
03:18, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Where a footnote applies only to material within parentheses, the ref tags belong just before the closing parenthesis., this applies to the templated info since its disputed information. I can't add a citation inside a covert template.
The building originally had 320 units, but many have been combined, and there are now 219. Last week saw only six vacancies.
Hey again Etriusus, I'm finished my review, see comments above. Feel free to reply to them inline if you'd like. If there's any questions let me know. Thanks! grungaloo ( talk) 01:16, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
PrimalMustelid
talk
03:58, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Etriusus ( talk). Self-nominated at 04:31, 8 February 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Elmwood Tower; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General eligibility:
Policy compliance:
Hook eligibility:
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |