This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Elizabeth Warren 2020 presidential campaign article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This article seems very premature. Warren has not yet announced she is running. Every cycle, a few candidates (even "major" ones) form exploratory committees and then do not run. In past elections (granted, I was only around for the 2016 election), we have waited until the formal declaration was made before starting the main article. I would suggest merging this article with Elizabeth Warren#2020 presidential election until a formal announcement is made or impending. For now, it fails WP:WEIGHT and WP:TOOSOON. PrairieKid ( talk) 20:15, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
SecretName101 ( talk) 01:45, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
Keep It Even If She Doesn't Enter. I think it's obvious that she'll enter, and in that case might as well keep it. But even if she doesn't, I think it would be worth keeping it. After all, we have pages for Tom Vilsack and Evan Bayh's 2008 campaigns even though they never got past the exploratory stage. Pickle Mon ( talk) 05:49, 12 January 2019 (UTC)Pickle Mon
It should stay. There was wide speculation over whether she will run and she did formally announce forming the exploratory committee. She's been in the spotlight for the viral announcement. We should keep it. capriaf ( talk) 19:00, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
No mention of Pocahontas? I Googled "elizabeth warren Pocahontas" and got 3.1 million results. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.114.108.98 ( talk) 21:00, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
This article needs to be updated for Warren's 2020 campaign. Free college and student debt forgiveness plans. And all of her other policies that have gotten huge media coverage. PunxtawneyPickle ( talk) 02:34, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
The article is really informative, and for the most part neutral, but there is some loaded language in here. Examples include:
And most blatantly,
I know I'm not the best person to clean this up, or I would, but I wanted to bring it to the right person's attention, especially as the Warren campaign picks up steam. Thanks. - Amatheur ( talk) 14:24, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Can we delete the entire endorsements box? I don’t see the benefit of having the {{ main article}} link and a duplicate box. This is essentially creating double work, as updates to one article have to be matched in the other and vice versa. Warren’s list of endorsements is also fairly long, so this adds to the page size and creates unnecessary citation clutter. Bobbychan193 ( talk) 22:25, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
New Story from Politico about the campaign. – MJL ‐Talk‐ ☖ 01:38, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
talk:2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries#Two part RfC about inclusion criteria for listing candidates in infoboxes. -
Mr
X 🖋
02:10, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Somebody please do a section on this for the article. --- Dagme ( talk) 21:20, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
The final sentence in the lede paragraph states she suspended her campaign, I was thinking to expand upon maybe some of the reasons that led up to this ultimate decision, mainly her poor performance on Super Tuesday, I think that this information gives a good consensus as to why the campaign was suspended and all those facts can be backed by RS, thoughts? -- TomaHawk61 ( talk) 19:51, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
To be blunt, the article is shit. It hardly describes many aspects of the campaign, and leaves many other aspects unmentioned. I plan to help make improvements going forward, when I can find the time. SecretName101 ( talk) 18:30, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Elizabeth Warren 2020 presidential campaign article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This article seems very premature. Warren has not yet announced she is running. Every cycle, a few candidates (even "major" ones) form exploratory committees and then do not run. In past elections (granted, I was only around for the 2016 election), we have waited until the formal declaration was made before starting the main article. I would suggest merging this article with Elizabeth Warren#2020 presidential election until a formal announcement is made or impending. For now, it fails WP:WEIGHT and WP:TOOSOON. PrairieKid ( talk) 20:15, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
SecretName101 ( talk) 01:45, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
Keep It Even If She Doesn't Enter. I think it's obvious that she'll enter, and in that case might as well keep it. But even if she doesn't, I think it would be worth keeping it. After all, we have pages for Tom Vilsack and Evan Bayh's 2008 campaigns even though they never got past the exploratory stage. Pickle Mon ( talk) 05:49, 12 January 2019 (UTC)Pickle Mon
It should stay. There was wide speculation over whether she will run and she did formally announce forming the exploratory committee. She's been in the spotlight for the viral announcement. We should keep it. capriaf ( talk) 19:00, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
No mention of Pocahontas? I Googled "elizabeth warren Pocahontas" and got 3.1 million results. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.114.108.98 ( talk) 21:00, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
This article needs to be updated for Warren's 2020 campaign. Free college and student debt forgiveness plans. And all of her other policies that have gotten huge media coverage. PunxtawneyPickle ( talk) 02:34, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
The article is really informative, and for the most part neutral, but there is some loaded language in here. Examples include:
And most blatantly,
I know I'm not the best person to clean this up, or I would, but I wanted to bring it to the right person's attention, especially as the Warren campaign picks up steam. Thanks. - Amatheur ( talk) 14:24, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Can we delete the entire endorsements box? I don’t see the benefit of having the {{ main article}} link and a duplicate box. This is essentially creating double work, as updates to one article have to be matched in the other and vice versa. Warren’s list of endorsements is also fairly long, so this adds to the page size and creates unnecessary citation clutter. Bobbychan193 ( talk) 22:25, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
New Story from Politico about the campaign. – MJL ‐Talk‐ ☖ 01:38, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
talk:2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries#Two part RfC about inclusion criteria for listing candidates in infoboxes. -
Mr
X 🖋
02:10, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Somebody please do a section on this for the article. --- Dagme ( talk) 21:20, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
The final sentence in the lede paragraph states she suspended her campaign, I was thinking to expand upon maybe some of the reasons that led up to this ultimate decision, mainly her poor performance on Super Tuesday, I think that this information gives a good consensus as to why the campaign was suspended and all those facts can be backed by RS, thoughts? -- TomaHawk61 ( talk) 19:51, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
To be blunt, the article is shit. It hardly describes many aspects of the campaign, and leaves many other aspects unmentioned. I plan to help make improvements going forward, when I can find the time. SecretName101 ( talk) 18:30, 21 February 2021 (UTC)