Elizabeth Parish has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: January 7, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Elizabeth Parish appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 7 January 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
The result was: promoted by
Bruxton (
talk)
19:48, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
Moved to mainspace by Kusma ( talk). Self-nominated at 00:00, 21 December 2022 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Unexpectedlydian ( talk · contribs) 20:26, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi @
Kusma, I'll be reviewing this article using the table below. Comments to follow soon!
Unexpectedlydian♯4
talk‽
20:26, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
Lead
Early life and family
Work for the Bowes-Lyon family
Marriage and death
Legacy
| |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. |
Lead sections
Layout Words to watch
Fiction
List incorporation
| |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. |
| |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). |
I will do an initial spot-check around 10% of references, continuing if I find many issues. Moore 2009
Talbot 2017
Society of Antiquaries of London 1798
Hills 1910
Happy with spot checks.
| |
2c. it contains no original research. |
| |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. |
Moore 2009
| |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. |
| |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). |
| |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. |
| |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. |
| |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. |
| |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. |
| |
7. Overall assessment. |
Elizabeth Parish has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: January 7, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Elizabeth Parish appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 7 January 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
The result was: promoted by
Bruxton (
talk)
19:48, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
Moved to mainspace by Kusma ( talk). Self-nominated at 00:00, 21 December 2022 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Unexpectedlydian ( talk · contribs) 20:26, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi @
Kusma, I'll be reviewing this article using the table below. Comments to follow soon!
Unexpectedlydian♯4
talk‽
20:26, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
Lead
Early life and family
Work for the Bowes-Lyon family
Marriage and death
Legacy
| |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. |
Lead sections
Layout Words to watch
Fiction
List incorporation
| |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. |
| |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). |
I will do an initial spot-check around 10% of references, continuing if I find many issues. Moore 2009
Talbot 2017
Society of Antiquaries of London 1798
Hills 1910
Happy with spot checks.
| |
2c. it contains no original research. |
| |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. |
Moore 2009
| |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. |
| |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). |
| |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. |
| |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. |
| |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. |
| |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. |
| |
7. Overall assessment. |