The article is rewritten at Eliyahu_Rips/temp.
It contains one fact that might be hard to believe without evidence (Rips 1969 attempt of self-immolation). Here are two sources which confirm that it's real [1], [2]. Andris 02:54, May 23, 2004 (UTC)
Why not add the amazing story about how he disproved the "dimension subgroup conjecture" using a pencil and a piece of toilet-paper while incarnated? source —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 89.138.179.244 ( talk) 20:18, 10 December 2006 (UTC).
I ran a Google Scholar search on E. Rips. I hit 37 math articles, and 4 arts/humanities articles. The math articles, which do not refer to the "Torah codes", have about 300 citations, all together. The "torah code" articles (classified as arts/humanities) have 7 citations. Need I say more? This article needs to be revised substantially to comply with NPOV. Clearly 300 is much greater than 7. DavidCBryant 00:23, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Have we any source for these categories? I am tempted to remove them, just because nothing in the article actually indicates that he is all three. -- Y not? 13:57, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 11:27, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Most mathematicians probably think the Bible Code is a hoax. However, in this article, the refutations are qualified with the blanket statement that their methods are "strongly questioned". Also, all three of the in-line references are from pro-code authors. The section ends with the simple paragraph that Rips converted from atheism to Judaism, implying that it was an effect of the Code. This is an obvious case of POV. -- 68.160.204.144 ( talk) 12:15, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
lolwut
This means what exactly? I wasn't aware that mathematics was some sort of worldwide sport or competition. Nevermind this atrocious, nonsensical sentence: "Eliyahu Rips, with a spontaneous very humble personality, is one of the leading mathematicians of the World, specialist in the micro-field of group theory, devoting too much of his time researching codes in the Torah." Seriously WTF, how is this on wikipedia? 68.227.163.169 ( talk) 13:21, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
The recent edits of Xelba.davi violate the rules in multiple ways. In the following my comments are in [red].
McKay ( talk) 03:53, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
The article about Eliyahu Rips and the Codes of the Torah is neutral and objective. It is true and encyclopedic. Does not violate the parameters of Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xelba.davi ( talk • contribs) 09:36, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
I think you must put the last version by Xelba.davi, that is real and true. This one is incomplete and obsolete. The version of Xelba.davi was true, clear and complete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.81.194.12 ( talk) 18:31, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
References
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Eliyahu Rips. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:37, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The article is rewritten at Eliyahu_Rips/temp.
It contains one fact that might be hard to believe without evidence (Rips 1969 attempt of self-immolation). Here are two sources which confirm that it's real [1], [2]. Andris 02:54, May 23, 2004 (UTC)
Why not add the amazing story about how he disproved the "dimension subgroup conjecture" using a pencil and a piece of toilet-paper while incarnated? source —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 89.138.179.244 ( talk) 20:18, 10 December 2006 (UTC).
I ran a Google Scholar search on E. Rips. I hit 37 math articles, and 4 arts/humanities articles. The math articles, which do not refer to the "Torah codes", have about 300 citations, all together. The "torah code" articles (classified as arts/humanities) have 7 citations. Need I say more? This article needs to be revised substantially to comply with NPOV. Clearly 300 is much greater than 7. DavidCBryant 00:23, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Have we any source for these categories? I am tempted to remove them, just because nothing in the article actually indicates that he is all three. -- Y not? 13:57, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 11:27, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Most mathematicians probably think the Bible Code is a hoax. However, in this article, the refutations are qualified with the blanket statement that their methods are "strongly questioned". Also, all three of the in-line references are from pro-code authors. The section ends with the simple paragraph that Rips converted from atheism to Judaism, implying that it was an effect of the Code. This is an obvious case of POV. -- 68.160.204.144 ( talk) 12:15, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
lolwut
This means what exactly? I wasn't aware that mathematics was some sort of worldwide sport or competition. Nevermind this atrocious, nonsensical sentence: "Eliyahu Rips, with a spontaneous very humble personality, is one of the leading mathematicians of the World, specialist in the micro-field of group theory, devoting too much of his time researching codes in the Torah." Seriously WTF, how is this on wikipedia? 68.227.163.169 ( talk) 13:21, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
The recent edits of Xelba.davi violate the rules in multiple ways. In the following my comments are in [red].
McKay ( talk) 03:53, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
The article about Eliyahu Rips and the Codes of the Torah is neutral and objective. It is true and encyclopedic. Does not violate the parameters of Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xelba.davi ( talk • contribs) 09:36, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
I think you must put the last version by Xelba.davi, that is real and true. This one is incomplete and obsolete. The version of Xelba.davi was true, clear and complete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.81.194.12 ( talk) 18:31, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
References
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Eliyahu Rips. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:37, 15 December 2017 (UTC)