This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Elgin Cathedral article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Elgin Cathedral is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on April 10, 2014. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I think this article should be peer reviewed, and possibly nominated for featured article status, well done to all the contibutors! — PM J 12:52, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
1. Well written. Clear prose and layout. Done
2. Accurate and verifiable. Footnotes from reliable sources. Done
3. Broad. Major topics are covered with no unnecessary details. Done
4. Neutral. Done
5. Stable. Done
6. Images. Appropriate with fair use rationale. Done
Well done. Agree with above. This is FA material. --
SECisek 01:27, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
Can someone clarify the meaning of the dates in the infobox? We have:
and later:
It's far from clear to me what these mean. What are all the xes about? Can these be translated into a form that will be clear to the average reader? TSP 14:36, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I have been asked to give my opinion on whether this article is ready for a shot at FAC. I think that while it is a very good article, I'm afraid that there are a number of problems that might delay or fail an FAC nomination. I do however think that the article is close to the standard required and that only a few changes are needed, listed below.-- Jackyd101 ( talk) 23:07, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Elgin Cathedral/archive1
There's a harv error with Cowan 1967. Curly Turkey ( gobble) 02:47, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Just wanted to note how impressed I am with this article. In particular, the table of figures at the bottom is very useful, but the whole article is detailed. Well done! Brutannica ( talk) 04:41, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Elgin Cathedral. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:02, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Elgin Cathedral article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Elgin Cathedral is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on April 10, 2014. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I think this article should be peer reviewed, and possibly nominated for featured article status, well done to all the contibutors! — PM J 12:52, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
1. Well written. Clear prose and layout. Done
2. Accurate and verifiable. Footnotes from reliable sources. Done
3. Broad. Major topics are covered with no unnecessary details. Done
4. Neutral. Done
5. Stable. Done
6. Images. Appropriate with fair use rationale. Done
Well done. Agree with above. This is FA material. --
SECisek 01:27, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
Can someone clarify the meaning of the dates in the infobox? We have:
and later:
It's far from clear to me what these mean. What are all the xes about? Can these be translated into a form that will be clear to the average reader? TSP 14:36, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I have been asked to give my opinion on whether this article is ready for a shot at FAC. I think that while it is a very good article, I'm afraid that there are a number of problems that might delay or fail an FAC nomination. I do however think that the article is close to the standard required and that only a few changes are needed, listed below.-- Jackyd101 ( talk) 23:07, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Elgin Cathedral/archive1
There's a harv error with Cowan 1967. Curly Turkey ( gobble) 02:47, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Just wanted to note how impressed I am with this article. In particular, the table of figures at the bottom is very useful, but the whole article is detailed. Well done! Brutannica ( talk) 04:41, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Elgin Cathedral. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:02, 30 September 2017 (UTC)