This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
No explanation, text just dropped. WHY? Vivaverdi 14:24, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
Today I have posted the following on the Talk page of the person who continues to vandalize this article:
Therefore, I am asking editors to acknowledge on this page their agreement that the existing copy is a necessary part of the article, in the hope that User talk:62.85.192.81 will see the light and stop behaving in the way that he/she has been.
Viva-Verdi 15:29, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
I support the removal of this sentence, which has now been done by 2 editors.
Not only is it poor grammar, but it is a point of view in making a judgement about cost.
I trust that the anonymous editor will review this "Talk" page and make any further justifications here before adding anything back in.
Viva-Verdi ( talk) 16:11, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
No explanation, text just dropped. WHY? Vivaverdi 14:24, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
Today I have posted the following on the Talk page of the person who continues to vandalize this article:
Therefore, I am asking editors to acknowledge on this page their agreement that the existing copy is a necessary part of the article, in the hope that User talk:62.85.192.81 will see the light and stop behaving in the way that he/she has been.
Viva-Verdi 15:29, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
I support the removal of this sentence, which has now been done by 2 editors.
Not only is it poor grammar, but it is a point of view in making a judgement about cost.
I trust that the anonymous editor will review this "Talk" page and make any further justifications here before adding anything back in.
Viva-Verdi ( talk) 16:11, 22 November 2008 (UTC)