This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
This article seems like it was written by people at Electrolux, or at the very least, people who are biased toward their product. It seems to me that a more objective technical discussion is more appropriate here, as Wikipedia is supposed to be a source of information, not an advertising space.
The article spend too much on comparing with Roomba instead of just describing the features of the Trilobite. The article on the Roomba is better is this regard. Pukkie ( talk) 07:31, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
This article seems like it was written by people at Electrolux, or at the very least, people who are biased toward their product. It seems to me that a more objective technical discussion is more appropriate here, as Wikipedia is supposed to be a source of information, not an advertising space.
The article spend too much on comparing with Roomba instead of just describing the features of the Trilobite. The article on the Roomba is better is this regard. Pukkie ( talk) 07:31, 30 November 2007 (UTC)