From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Electroencephalophone vs. encephalophone

I think electroencephalophone should be redirected to encephalophone. -- Jreferee 15:56, 1 November 2006 (UTC) reply

Both seem to be pretty rare terms:
Electroencephalophone
3 Google Scholar results
464 Google results
Encephalophone
5 Google Scholar results
288 Google results
Both have dictionary definitions. I don't really care either way. — Omegatron 20:07, 20 December 2006 (UTC) reply
I wonder: Is there an encephalophone that is not electric? If so then we need separate articles; if not, a redirect will do the trick. -- Theodore Kloba 18:48, 10 May 2007 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Electroencephalophone vs. encephalophone

I think electroencephalophone should be redirected to encephalophone. -- Jreferee 15:56, 1 November 2006 (UTC) reply

Both seem to be pretty rare terms:
Electroencephalophone
3 Google Scholar results
464 Google results
Encephalophone
5 Google Scholar results
288 Google results
Both have dictionary definitions. I don't really care either way. — Omegatron 20:07, 20 December 2006 (UTC) reply
I wonder: Is there an encephalophone that is not electric? If so then we need separate articles; if not, a redirect will do the trick. -- Theodore Kloba 18:48, 10 May 2007 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook