This article was the subject of an educational assignment that ended on 15 May 2013. Further details are available here. |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about rumors and speculation about the book. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about rumors and speculation about the book at the Reference desk. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Eldest has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This is a good beginning for the Eldest article, but some significant revisions and additions still need to be made:
If you have any questions about this review, feel free to drop me a line on my talk page. Awadewit | talk 21:09, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
I just forgot to log on and added the ArticleHistory template. Sorry! Shrewpelt ( talk) 14:01, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
As Barnes and Noble is selling these books, can we really take their review as a legitimate criticism? To me, it's the equivalent of looking at the book sleeve for an unbiased review of the book... —Preceding unsigned comment added by DeviantCharles ( talk • contribs) 09:09, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
I've addressed all concerns that the reviewer had, so I think this article might get GA now. Are there any comments or concerns about me proposing Eldest? Shrewpelt ( talk) 19:44, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
I have these three things down. Any other comments? Shrewpelt ( talk) 02:55, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
That is bothering me too, and I plan to continue expanding the article during its GAC period. I've just expanded the Themes section a bit. Shrewpelt ( talk) 02:45, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of February 23, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:
Future improvements could be designing a table for the release dates of the book. More notable information could be added on the other editions. How well did the deluxe edition sell? How was it recieved in other countries, did it make best selling lists their as well or is it unknown? Any real world information about the actual writing process would also improve the article, how long did the book take the write for instance. Is it known if anything significant was cut from the book? Hope these give you some ideas for future expansion! If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— Million_Moments ( talk) 23:20, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Thank you! Shrewpelt ( talk) 01:54, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
When I search the site for "Orrin" I am redirected to this page –which as far as I can tell– has no mentions of that word whatsoever. I would expect to be directed to a disambiguation page, since there is at least one infamous American senator with that name.
ONCE AGIN i have to say this on this page!!!! Orrin is King Orrin of Surda!!! He is a character!!!! good greif User:Dursely —Preceding comment was added at 19:01, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
This talk page is getting a bit long. Does anyone else think it should be archived? Shrewpelt ( talk) 20:14, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
What exactly does the title refer to in the book? Eragon and Brisingr make sense, but what about Eldest? That should be in the article somewhere, because I don't remember what and it's not listed anywhere. Anakinjmt ( talk) 02:10, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Eldest. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:05, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
This article was the subject of an educational assignment that ended on 15 May 2013. Further details are available here. |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about rumors and speculation about the book. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about rumors and speculation about the book at the Reference desk. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Eldest has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This is a good beginning for the Eldest article, but some significant revisions and additions still need to be made:
If you have any questions about this review, feel free to drop me a line on my talk page. Awadewit | talk 21:09, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
I just forgot to log on and added the ArticleHistory template. Sorry! Shrewpelt ( talk) 14:01, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
As Barnes and Noble is selling these books, can we really take their review as a legitimate criticism? To me, it's the equivalent of looking at the book sleeve for an unbiased review of the book... —Preceding unsigned comment added by DeviantCharles ( talk • contribs) 09:09, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
I've addressed all concerns that the reviewer had, so I think this article might get GA now. Are there any comments or concerns about me proposing Eldest? Shrewpelt ( talk) 19:44, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
I have these three things down. Any other comments? Shrewpelt ( talk) 02:55, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
That is bothering me too, and I plan to continue expanding the article during its GAC period. I've just expanded the Themes section a bit. Shrewpelt ( talk) 02:45, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of February 23, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:
Future improvements could be designing a table for the release dates of the book. More notable information could be added on the other editions. How well did the deluxe edition sell? How was it recieved in other countries, did it make best selling lists their as well or is it unknown? Any real world information about the actual writing process would also improve the article, how long did the book take the write for instance. Is it known if anything significant was cut from the book? Hope these give you some ideas for future expansion! If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— Million_Moments ( talk) 23:20, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Thank you! Shrewpelt ( talk) 01:54, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
When I search the site for "Orrin" I am redirected to this page –which as far as I can tell– has no mentions of that word whatsoever. I would expect to be directed to a disambiguation page, since there is at least one infamous American senator with that name.
ONCE AGIN i have to say this on this page!!!! Orrin is King Orrin of Surda!!! He is a character!!!! good greif User:Dursely —Preceding comment was added at 19:01, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
This talk page is getting a bit long. Does anyone else think it should be archived? Shrewpelt ( talk) 20:14, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
What exactly does the title refer to in the book? Eragon and Brisingr make sense, but what about Eldest? That should be in the article somewhere, because I don't remember what and it's not listed anywhere. Anakinjmt ( talk) 02:10, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Eldest. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:05, 18 September 2017 (UTC)