This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Italy Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Rivers Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

Please move it to Talk:Eisack. The talk page is stuck at Talk:Isarco probably because of Talk:Isarco#Move request April 2007 above. The result was then 5.5-1 for Eisack and 2.5-1 against Isarco. However, the page was soon after moved again by two users, as if the discussion did not take place ( [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]). PS: Should we inform all users in the past interested in the debate per template of the request or what do WP regulations say? Gun Powder Ma ( talk) 14:27, 5 February 2009 (UTC) reply

• Oppose. The last thing that south tyrolean articles need is moving. Ian Spackman ( talk) 15:26, 5 February 2009 (UTC) reply