Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
I reverted drorks edits since he is banned and has no right to do any edits at any article and his edits also removes that this Israeli settlements is an Israeli settlement. -- Supreme Deliciousness ( talk) 17:13, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
I reverted Poliocretes edit where he removed the Israeli settlement in the lead and cat, and the link to Israeli-occupied territories in see also section as they are all relevant and no explanation was given for removing them. -- Supreme Deliciousness ( talk) 22:53, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
There has been long discussion at WikiProject Israel Palestine Collaboration/Current Article Issues about adding the illegality issue in all settlement article: [1] There is now consensus to have the sentence: "The international community considers Israeli settlements in (the Golan Heights/the West Bank/East Jerusalem) illegal under international law, but the Israeli government disputes this." in all relevant articles, but its not clear yet exactly where in the article, I have tried to open up a discussion at IPCCAI: [2] [3] but I haven't gotten any replies to my latest posts. So now I'm just adding the sentence as I had explained at the IPCCAI discussion. If someone disagrees with the placement then we can discuss this. -- Supreme Deliciousness ( talk) 19:59, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
Jew-baiting is great fun, isn't it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.42.148.20 ( talk) 21:28, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
I reverted drorks edits since he is banned and has no right to do any edits at any article and his edits also removes that this Israeli settlements is an Israeli settlement. -- Supreme Deliciousness ( talk) 17:13, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
I reverted Poliocretes edit where he removed the Israeli settlement in the lead and cat, and the link to Israeli-occupied territories in see also section as they are all relevant and no explanation was given for removing them. -- Supreme Deliciousness ( talk) 22:53, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
There has been long discussion at WikiProject Israel Palestine Collaboration/Current Article Issues about adding the illegality issue in all settlement article: [1] There is now consensus to have the sentence: "The international community considers Israeli settlements in (the Golan Heights/the West Bank/East Jerusalem) illegal under international law, but the Israeli government disputes this." in all relevant articles, but its not clear yet exactly where in the article, I have tried to open up a discussion at IPCCAI: [2] [3] but I haven't gotten any replies to my latest posts. So now I'm just adding the sentence as I had explained at the IPCCAI discussion. If someone disagrees with the placement then we can discuss this. -- Supreme Deliciousness ( talk) 19:59, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
Jew-baiting is great fun, isn't it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.42.148.20 ( talk) 21:28, 16 March 2011 (UTC)