Effects of Hurricane Noel in the United States was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Given the preps section is pretty split, I think it'd be better organized to organize the article overall by location, not by preps then impact. That way, the one paragraph of Florida could be in the Florida section, and the one of New England could be in that section. ♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk) 00:53, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.
-- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 19:20, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
There was a brief discussion about this on IRC, as well as on this article's FAC. There is a lot of great content here, and I don't think it should be off on its own article. Seeing as the main article isn't all that long, I think this can easily fit in there (and not to mention, it's pretty redundant having a separate article considering this only has a few more paragraphs of info). --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 02:08, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
We never did this. Is anyone opposed? --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 05:07, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
Effects of Hurricane Noel in the United States was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Given the preps section is pretty split, I think it'd be better organized to organize the article overall by location, not by preps then impact. That way, the one paragraph of Florida could be in the Florida section, and the one of New England could be in that section. ♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk) 00:53, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.
-- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 19:20, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
There was a brief discussion about this on IRC, as well as on this article's FAC. There is a lot of great content here, and I don't think it should be off on its own article. Seeing as the main article isn't all that long, I think this can easily fit in there (and not to mention, it's pretty redundant having a separate article considering this only has a few more paragraphs of info). --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 02:08, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
We never did this. Is anyone opposed? --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 05:07, 17 February 2013 (UTC)