Edziza Formation has been listed as one of the
Natural sciences good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: April 5, 2024. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: Volcanoguy ( talk · contribs) 00:21, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Jaguar ( talk · contribs) 22:26, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Didn't realise I haven't claimed this. I'm on mobile, please expect comments tonight or tomorrow morning. ♦
JAG
UAR 22:26, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Well... as much as I don't like leaving short reviews, there's simply nothing else to add here. It's well written, comprehensive and simply put meets the GA criteria. As such I'm compelled to pass it, well done once again. ♦ JAG UAR 22:49, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Edziza Formation has been listed as one of the
Natural sciences good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: April 5, 2024. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: Volcanoguy ( talk · contribs) 00:21, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Jaguar ( talk · contribs) 22:26, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Didn't realise I haven't claimed this. I'm on mobile, please expect comments tonight or tomorrow morning. ♦
JAG
UAR 22:26, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Well... as much as I don't like leaving short reviews, there's simply nothing else to add here. It's well written, comprehensive and simply put meets the GA criteria. As such I'm compelled to pass it, well done once again. ♦ JAG UAR 22:49, 5 April 2024 (UTC)