Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch Starting review. Pyrotec ( talk) 14:43, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
Overall the article is well illustrated, appears comprehensive in scope; and appears to be at GA level. I will be looking at it in more detail today & tomorrow. I suspect that there will be a few minor niggle's, possibly on WP:verify, for instance Honours from Oxford and the Birmingham Society of Artists have no citations; and the "Influence" subsection has only one citation. Pyrotec ( talk) 08:10, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Congratulations. I'm awarding GA status. 20:23, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch Starting review. Pyrotec ( talk) 14:43, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
Overall the article is well illustrated, appears comprehensive in scope; and appears to be at GA level. I will be looking at it in more detail today & tomorrow. I suspect that there will be a few minor niggle's, possibly on WP:verify, for instance Honours from Oxford and the Birmingham Society of Artists have no citations; and the "Influence" subsection has only one citation. Pyrotec ( talk) 08:10, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Congratulations. I'm awarding GA status. 20:23, 5 October 2008 (UTC)