This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have made some corrections to follow NPOV policy. The previous version was offensive for the person described in this article. Biophys 07:09, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
There are more than 200 books by notable authors who cite publications by Radzinsky [1]. Cherry picking a single quote by non-notable teacher hardly serves wikipedia purpose. Biophys ( talk) 00:41, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
There is a problem with this edit. Those are Russian language sources, some of which do not qualify as RS. Most important, none of them provides any specific criticism of works by Radzinsky. If any of the publications would be written by another historian who tells: "Radzinsky was wrong by describing such and such historical events because ...", such criticism could be included. Please post here anything of this nature from the provided sources. I do not see anything. If there is nothing like that, the entire passage should be removed from the BLP. Thanks, My very best wishes ( talk) 23:57, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
"Radzinsky also seems unaware of the problematic nature of sources like A. Orlov (pp. 31-32, 341) and B.Nikolaevsky's 'Letter of an Old Bolshevik' (p. 359)... Radzinsky is mistaken in the claim that Lenin received German subsidies throughout the First World War ... makes unfounded assertions about the coldness and brevity of Stalin's letters to his colleagues ... Vast stretches of the narrative are devoted to the resurrection of tired old debates including whether or not Stalin was a tsarist agent-provocateur ... Stalin's decision-making rationale is repeatedly linked to phrases out of the terrorist S. Nechaev's Revolutionary catechism ... Equally unfounded are claims that Stalin intercepted and destroyed portions of Lenin's so-called last testament (pp. 207-210) and single-handedly launched the Lenin cult (p. 213)." , and so on.
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Edvard Radzinsky. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:07, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have made some corrections to follow NPOV policy. The previous version was offensive for the person described in this article. Biophys 07:09, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
There are more than 200 books by notable authors who cite publications by Radzinsky [1]. Cherry picking a single quote by non-notable teacher hardly serves wikipedia purpose. Biophys ( talk) 00:41, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
There is a problem with this edit. Those are Russian language sources, some of which do not qualify as RS. Most important, none of them provides any specific criticism of works by Radzinsky. If any of the publications would be written by another historian who tells: "Radzinsky was wrong by describing such and such historical events because ...", such criticism could be included. Please post here anything of this nature from the provided sources. I do not see anything. If there is nothing like that, the entire passage should be removed from the BLP. Thanks, My very best wishes ( talk) 23:57, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
"Radzinsky also seems unaware of the problematic nature of sources like A. Orlov (pp. 31-32, 341) and B.Nikolaevsky's 'Letter of an Old Bolshevik' (p. 359)... Radzinsky is mistaken in the claim that Lenin received German subsidies throughout the First World War ... makes unfounded assertions about the coldness and brevity of Stalin's letters to his colleagues ... Vast stretches of the narrative are devoted to the resurrection of tired old debates including whether or not Stalin was a tsarist agent-provocateur ... Stalin's decision-making rationale is repeatedly linked to phrases out of the terrorist S. Nechaev's Revolutionary catechism ... Equally unfounded are claims that Stalin intercepted and destroyed portions of Lenin's so-called last testament (pp. 207-210) and single-handedly launched the Lenin cult (p. 213)." , and so on.
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Edvard Radzinsky. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:07, 17 September 2017 (UTC)