GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Dana boomer ( talk · contribs) 01:12, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi! I'll be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have my full review up shortly. Dana boomer ( talk) 01:12, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
Unfortunately, I'm going to have to fail this article's GA nomination. The severe lack of references, combined with the listy-ness, lack of context, choppy-ness and poor prose, are too severe, in my opinion, to be corrected within the usual timeframe of GA. I would suggest that the nominator, before renominating, take some time to restructure the article a bit, work on the referencing, improve the lead and history sections and comb through the prose. Please let me know if you have any questions, Dana boomer ( talk) 01:33, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Dana boomer ( talk · contribs) 01:12, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi! I'll be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have my full review up shortly. Dana boomer ( talk) 01:12, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
Unfortunately, I'm going to have to fail this article's GA nomination. The severe lack of references, combined with the listy-ness, lack of context, choppy-ness and poor prose, are too severe, in my opinion, to be corrected within the usual timeframe of GA. I would suggest that the nominator, before renominating, take some time to restructure the article a bit, work on the referencing, improve the lead and history sections and comb through the prose. Please let me know if you have any questions, Dana boomer ( talk) 01:33, 30 July 2012 (UTC)