![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I've added some third-party sources - mainly newspapers - and expanded the article, including a short piece about the significance of the organisation. Autarch ( talk) 21:13, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
I have concerns that this redirect may be self-promotional.
From Wikipedia:Redirect#Reasons_for_deleting:
"The redirect constitutes self-promotion..." (Speedy deletion criterion G11 may apply.) ( Speedy deletion criterion G11
Educate Together appears to be a for profit organization.
Veriss (
talk)
21:15, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
Whatever position Atheist Ireland took in the past, it seems to have become critical of Educate Together: [1] I'm not sure if this blog entry would be unsuitable as a source, given that it's a blog or if it could be taken as the position of Atheist Ireland. Autarch ( talk) 00:35, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Educate Together. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 23:49, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Educate Together. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 11:10, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
I have added a " primary" tag to the article. Despite the excellent work by Autarch some years ago, there is still an over-reliance on primary sources. Making the article (quite unfortunately really) read a bit like a press-release. Additional secondary sources would ideally be added. Which might also encourage some of the more promotional language to be tempered a little. (It helps neither the project or the subject if the tone is overly promotional. A seasoned reader will immediately spot a "puff piece" and will dismiss it as such. Sometimes I think editors with close associations don't seem to recognise that....) Guliolopez ( talk) 15:50, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I've added some third-party sources - mainly newspapers - and expanded the article, including a short piece about the significance of the organisation. Autarch ( talk) 21:13, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
I have concerns that this redirect may be self-promotional.
From Wikipedia:Redirect#Reasons_for_deleting:
"The redirect constitutes self-promotion..." (Speedy deletion criterion G11 may apply.) ( Speedy deletion criterion G11
Educate Together appears to be a for profit organization.
Veriss (
talk)
21:15, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
Whatever position Atheist Ireland took in the past, it seems to have become critical of Educate Together: [1] I'm not sure if this blog entry would be unsuitable as a source, given that it's a blog or if it could be taken as the position of Atheist Ireland. Autarch ( talk) 00:35, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Educate Together. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 23:49, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Educate Together. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 11:10, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
I have added a " primary" tag to the article. Despite the excellent work by Autarch some years ago, there is still an over-reliance on primary sources. Making the article (quite unfortunately really) read a bit like a press-release. Additional secondary sources would ideally be added. Which might also encourage some of the more promotional language to be tempered a little. (It helps neither the project or the subject if the tone is overly promotional. A seasoned reader will immediately spot a "puff piece" and will dismiss it as such. Sometimes I think editors with close associations don't seem to recognise that....) Guliolopez ( talk) 15:50, 8 December 2016 (UTC)