This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Edo literature article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Edo literature has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
January 10, 2024. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that
Edo literature was influenced by British colonialism in the late 19th century, which introduced the
Roman script and Christianity to the
Edo people? |
This article is written in Nigerian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realize, travelled, centre) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Reading Beans ( talk · contribs) 06:05, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of November 4, 2023, compares against the six good article criteria:
I could be missing something, but, whatever it is can not be so awful. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it Good article reassessed. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— Reading Beans ( talk) 15:58, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
This is the things I have seen so far. Best, Reading Beans ( talk) 06:05, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
PrimalMustelid
talk 02:33, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Vanderwaalforces ( talk). Self-nominated at 09:52, 6 November 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Edo literature; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Edo literature article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Edo literature has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
January 10, 2024. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that
Edo literature was influenced by British colonialism in the late 19th century, which introduced the
Roman script and Christianity to the
Edo people? |
This article is written in Nigerian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realize, travelled, centre) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Reading Beans ( talk · contribs) 06:05, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of November 4, 2023, compares against the six good article criteria:
I could be missing something, but, whatever it is can not be so awful. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it Good article reassessed. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— Reading Beans ( talk) 15:58, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
This is the things I have seen so far. Best, Reading Beans ( talk) 06:05, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
PrimalMustelid
talk 02:33, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Vanderwaalforces ( talk). Self-nominated at 09:52, 6 November 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Edo literature; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.