This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. New Jersey Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I really don't think this article is going to grow into something big. I think both stubs would benefit if the contents of this article were merged into Edison Storage Battery Company.
Or maybe it should be merged into Thomas Edison National Historical Park - if it is an official part of that.
-- BjKa ( talk) 23:29, 13 November 2012 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Edison Storage Battery Company Building. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090327025729/http://www.state.nj.us/dep/hpo/1identify/lists/essex.pdf to http://www.state.nj.us/dep/hpo/1identify/lists/essex.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{ Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.   Jim.henderson ( talk) 19:54, 23 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:58, 20 December 2016 (UTC) reply