This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello, my name is Danny and I'm an employee for the Edenton Steamers. I realize the potential for a conflict of interest with having made a major edit to the Edenton Steamers wikipedia page. I would like everyone to know who is involved with wikipedia contributing that everything I updated is verifiable on the the two links at the bottom of the page. Namely, www.edentonsteamers.com and www.coastalplain.com which is our league website. I in no way changed, enchanced or promoted the team or the league beyond reasonably explaining the history of the Edenton Steamers. The reason we decided to edit our own page was because the prior information was outdated, some was false and the 2010 season update, which we didn't write, was very unclear and poorly written. The management of the Edenton Steamers decided that if we were to have a wikipedia page (which they were very happy they did have one once they realized) we would like the information to be accurate and up to date. I hope this dis-pells any thoughts of violating the wikipedia guidelines in anyway. Feel free to read over the changes and cross check them with the websites I have listed earlier and e-mail me with any questions. Thanks and I look forward to becoming a member of the wikipedia universe! SteamersCPL ( talk) 19:59, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
It was unintentional to remove the clean-up tag at the top, I didn't realize it removed those when I put the code in for the original info box. The info box that I had put back up there was the info box that was originally on the site when it was created, which I didn't do. If there is no standard info box for collegiate teams then why can't I put the info box I had up back on the page? Before I edited the page a few days ago some of the information was inaccurate and the writing was awful, how come nobody marked it as needing clean-up then? But now that it's more up to date and the information is accurate it's marked for clean-up. Perhaps I don't understand the standards completely but that seems backward. SteamersCPL ( talk) 19:19, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello, my name is Danny and I'm an employee for the Edenton Steamers. I realize the potential for a conflict of interest with having made a major edit to the Edenton Steamers wikipedia page. I would like everyone to know who is involved with wikipedia contributing that everything I updated is verifiable on the the two links at the bottom of the page. Namely, www.edentonsteamers.com and www.coastalplain.com which is our league website. I in no way changed, enchanced or promoted the team or the league beyond reasonably explaining the history of the Edenton Steamers. The reason we decided to edit our own page was because the prior information was outdated, some was false and the 2010 season update, which we didn't write, was very unclear and poorly written. The management of the Edenton Steamers decided that if we were to have a wikipedia page (which they were very happy they did have one once they realized) we would like the information to be accurate and up to date. I hope this dis-pells any thoughts of violating the wikipedia guidelines in anyway. Feel free to read over the changes and cross check them with the websites I have listed earlier and e-mail me with any questions. Thanks and I look forward to becoming a member of the wikipedia universe! SteamersCPL ( talk) 19:59, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
It was unintentional to remove the clean-up tag at the top, I didn't realize it removed those when I put the code in for the original info box. The info box that I had put back up there was the info box that was originally on the site when it was created, which I didn't do. If there is no standard info box for collegiate teams then why can't I put the info box I had up back on the page? Before I edited the page a few days ago some of the information was inaccurate and the writing was awful, how come nobody marked it as needing clean-up then? But now that it's more up to date and the information is accurate it's marked for clean-up. Perhaps I don't understand the standards completely but that seems backward. SteamersCPL ( talk) 19:19, 11 April 2011 (UTC)