This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Philosophy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Ecology This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Ecology, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve ecology-related articles.EcologyWikipedia:WikiProject EcologyTemplate:WikiProject EcologyEcology articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. Environment This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This section lacks any references and simply appears to be the authors own blinkered perspective. Consequently I have deleted it

User:SyTaffel 28 nov 2007

Social Ecology does not have a biocentrist perspective. Quite the opposite... or more balanced. Murray Bookchin, the founder of SE, is a harsh and outspoken critic of all the 'sophies' mentioned here, and especially Arne Næss' deep ecology. I have removed it from the list! -- PeterKristo 21:35, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply

A google search for "quantum ecosophy" brings up nothing but this article and a myspace page of a crackpot. Has there been anything written anywhere on quantum ecosophy? Eok20 06:03, 7 April 2007 (UTC) reply

An "ecosophy formulated from quantum mechanics" is. . . how do I phrase this nicely. . . complete nonsense. Seriously. Note that the article "quantum ecosophy" was speedily deleted as patent nonsense last November. Anville 13:44, 13 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Seems like this article lacks inline citations. Trixie05 ( talk) 14:17, 30 September 2013 (UTC) reply