This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
I think it only reasonable we need a source for the statement 'Doctors can administer a placebo.' Btyner 05:02, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
Perhaps structuring the echovirus article more would help - I'll take a bash at it and let me know what you think THIS ARTICLE NEEDS NO FRICKIN CLEANUP! A s t r o B o y 01:33, 7 December 2006 (UTC) A s t r o B o y 01:33, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
The Picornavirus Pages clearly distinguish between Enterovirus B: Echovirus and Parechovirus A – D. As this Info dates 2006 - 2019, The Pirbright Institute, UK, it apears to be reliable (enough). Some members of the former species Echovirus have been moved to new genus Parechovirus, some appear nowadays (with others) as subtypes of species Enterovirus B in genus Enterovirus -- Ernsts ( talk) 18:13, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
It seems that the template at the beginning of the article says 'Echovirus == ParechovirusA', that is not accurate. It is correct that some type of Echoviurses has moved and belong to Parechovirus. -- Kyuri1449 ( talk) 03:06, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
This article has been completely changed on 20 June 2020. I gather there was something outdated about the taxon etc., but did it really need a complete rewrite? The edit summary just says "making disambig", which doesn't explain much. The infobox disappeared, there are now no references, and the current structure and layout also seem odd to me (with the bulletpoint 'Summary' section, especially). I'm hoping the editor who did that would come and explain, but anyone else familiar with this matter, feel free to chip in also. -- DoubleGrazing ( talk) 13:50, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
I am trying to add more helpful references, the ones already there don't give much information. Weikerally — Preceding undated comment added 02:27, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
I think it only reasonable we need a source for the statement 'Doctors can administer a placebo.' Btyner 05:02, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
Perhaps structuring the echovirus article more would help - I'll take a bash at it and let me know what you think THIS ARTICLE NEEDS NO FRICKIN CLEANUP! A s t r o B o y 01:33, 7 December 2006 (UTC) A s t r o B o y 01:33, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
The Picornavirus Pages clearly distinguish between Enterovirus B: Echovirus and Parechovirus A – D. As this Info dates 2006 - 2019, The Pirbright Institute, UK, it apears to be reliable (enough). Some members of the former species Echovirus have been moved to new genus Parechovirus, some appear nowadays (with others) as subtypes of species Enterovirus B in genus Enterovirus -- Ernsts ( talk) 18:13, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
It seems that the template at the beginning of the article says 'Echovirus == ParechovirusA', that is not accurate. It is correct that some type of Echoviurses has moved and belong to Parechovirus. -- Kyuri1449 ( talk) 03:06, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
This article has been completely changed on 20 June 2020. I gather there was something outdated about the taxon etc., but did it really need a complete rewrite? The edit summary just says "making disambig", which doesn't explain much. The infobox disappeared, there are now no references, and the current structure and layout also seem odd to me (with the bulletpoint 'Summary' section, especially). I'm hoping the editor who did that would come and explain, but anyone else familiar with this matter, feel free to chip in also. -- DoubleGrazing ( talk) 13:50, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
I am trying to add more helpful references, the ones already there don't give much information. Weikerally — Preceding undated comment added 02:27, 10 April 2021 (UTC)