Ecco2K has been listed as one of the
Music good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: July 21, 2024. ( Reviewed version). |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Why is there a picture of bladee in an article about Ecco2k? Can we change that? ByAnyMeansNeccesary1 ( talk) 23:16, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
I feel like this misses the point of the LGBTQ+ themes in Ecco's work. Stating that Ecco's fashion and image disrupt gender norms in a broad, queer manner is one perspective, but asserting a definitive "presenting as female" identity lacks substantial evidence and appears presumptuous. The bio's rigid description overlooks Ecco's quasi-ambiguous exploration of such themes. Ecco's self-identification and romantic preferences have never been publicly stated, so I don't think it seems suitable to so flagrantly state a possibly erroneous fact. Hence, a broader term like 'queer' may better encapsulate its essence.
Overall, this seems like somene trying to mold Ecco's image into what they themselves believe it to be – and not what can actually be meaningfully deducted from a mere music video.o Would anyone have any objections to the removal of this specific statement? TVKR ( talk) 23:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
I removed the section that claimed that Bladee and Ecco2K have incorporated "queer themes" into their work. The article doesn't describe how they did that, nor include confirmation from the artists how they did that, nor provide examples. - AndreyKva ( talk) 03:14, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: Skyshifter ( talk · contribs) 22:59, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Kimikel ( talk · contribs) @ Skyshifter: I'm going to be reviewing this as a part of the July GA backlog drive. I should be done with my review within a few days. 03:04, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
@ Skyshifter: Please see my review below. There are some edits to make before I can pass this as a GA. I'll leave you seven days to consider my suggestions; if you need more time just let me know, no worries. Thank you for your nomination and let me know if you have any questions! Kimikel ( talk) 03:27, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Lead section seems out of order, it goes from 2013 to 2004. Should be reordered to be more chronological
[9] and [23] the only citations that have the website name wikilinked. The rest should be wikilinked for consistency
@ Kimikel: Everything above was applied, except where noted Skyshifter talk 05:39, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Skyshifter talk 19:55, 21 July 2024 (UTC).
Ecco2K has been listed as one of the
Music good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: July 21, 2024. ( Reviewed version). |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Why is there a picture of bladee in an article about Ecco2k? Can we change that? ByAnyMeansNeccesary1 ( talk) 23:16, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
I feel like this misses the point of the LGBTQ+ themes in Ecco's work. Stating that Ecco's fashion and image disrupt gender norms in a broad, queer manner is one perspective, but asserting a definitive "presenting as female" identity lacks substantial evidence and appears presumptuous. The bio's rigid description overlooks Ecco's quasi-ambiguous exploration of such themes. Ecco's self-identification and romantic preferences have never been publicly stated, so I don't think it seems suitable to so flagrantly state a possibly erroneous fact. Hence, a broader term like 'queer' may better encapsulate its essence.
Overall, this seems like somene trying to mold Ecco's image into what they themselves believe it to be – and not what can actually be meaningfully deducted from a mere music video.o Would anyone have any objections to the removal of this specific statement? TVKR ( talk) 23:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
I removed the section that claimed that Bladee and Ecco2K have incorporated "queer themes" into their work. The article doesn't describe how they did that, nor include confirmation from the artists how they did that, nor provide examples. - AndreyKva ( talk) 03:14, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: Skyshifter ( talk · contribs) 22:59, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Kimikel ( talk · contribs) @ Skyshifter: I'm going to be reviewing this as a part of the July GA backlog drive. I should be done with my review within a few days. 03:04, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
@ Skyshifter: Please see my review below. There are some edits to make before I can pass this as a GA. I'll leave you seven days to consider my suggestions; if you need more time just let me know, no worries. Thank you for your nomination and let me know if you have any questions! Kimikel ( talk) 03:27, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Lead section seems out of order, it goes from 2013 to 2004. Should be reordered to be more chronological
[9] and [23] the only citations that have the website name wikilinked. The rest should be wikilinked for consistency
@ Kimikel: Everything above was applied, except where noted Skyshifter talk 05:39, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Skyshifter talk 19:55, 21 July 2024 (UTC).