This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Ecce homo article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The phrase and the work of Nietzsche seem unseparated enough to deserve their own pages. I propose moving Nietzsche's work to its own page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.178.93.23 ( talk) 21:55, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
The leading paragraph says "The King James Version translates the phrase into English as Behold the Man.", implying (although silently) there's no consent on the correct translation. Moreover, it doesn't give other translation (or the correct one, if there is - I cannot read Latin). Which is? -- euyyn 18:32, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
There is a full fledged disambiguation page for Ecce Homo that already includes a lot of the material in the other references section of the page. To make it consistent, I will move the redundant items to the disambig page, where they really belong. History2007 ( talk) 22:15, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
Tobias Epos ( talk) 11:51, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
The many photos of paintings depicting Ecce homo cannot be viewed on a phone. Captions and images overlap and only parts of the images appear. I hope the format can be changed to be visible on small screens. - - Prairieplant ( talk) 03:41, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Ecce homo article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The phrase and the work of Nietzsche seem unseparated enough to deserve their own pages. I propose moving Nietzsche's work to its own page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.178.93.23 ( talk) 21:55, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
The leading paragraph says "The King James Version translates the phrase into English as Behold the Man.", implying (although silently) there's no consent on the correct translation. Moreover, it doesn't give other translation (or the correct one, if there is - I cannot read Latin). Which is? -- euyyn 18:32, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
There is a full fledged disambiguation page for Ecce Homo that already includes a lot of the material in the other references section of the page. To make it consistent, I will move the redundant items to the disambig page, where they really belong. History2007 ( talk) 22:15, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
Tobias Epos ( talk) 11:51, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
The many photos of paintings depicting Ecce homo cannot be viewed on a phone. Captions and images overlap and only parts of the images appear. I hope the format can be changed to be visible on small screens. - - Prairieplant ( talk) 03:41, 28 May 2024 (UTC)