This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Support: Why not just have Dancing Hero be its own section on the Angie Gold song article? There you can talk about the song hitting in Japan and the viral resurgence. From what I've seen Wikipedia has never had separate articles for cover versions, even if they're in different languages. Plus you could redirect "Dancing Hero (Eat You Up)" to the individual section.
FreeChurros (
talk)
07:33, 18 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Look at
I Will Always Love You. That's a cover arguably more well-known than it's original, and it's still just a section. Nobody argues that Whitney Houston's version should have its own article, even though it possibly outpaces Dolly Parton's in notability.
FreeChurros (
talk)
07:35, 18 March 2022 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Support: Why not just have Dancing Hero be its own section on the Angie Gold song article? There you can talk about the song hitting in Japan and the viral resurgence. From what I've seen Wikipedia has never had separate articles for cover versions, even if they're in different languages. Plus you could redirect "Dancing Hero (Eat You Up)" to the individual section.
FreeChurros (
talk)
07:33, 18 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Look at
I Will Always Love You. That's a cover arguably more well-known than it's original, and it's still just a section. Nobody argues that Whitney Houston's version should have its own article, even though it possibly outpaces Dolly Parton's in notability.
FreeChurros (
talk)
07:35, 18 March 2022 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.