This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Created the talk-page for the " Eastman Memorandum" article - in any case - Stay Safe and Healthy !! - Drbogdan ( talk) 01:06, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Memorandums? Seriously? Is that considered acceptable? GA-RT-22 ( talk) 18:01, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
The second page of the first Eastman memo is quoted in the "First memorandum" section but the article doesn't say anywhere that the memo is being quoted. I don't know how to add make it clear that all that text is lifted verbatim from the memo. Could someone make the change or tell me what to do? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cauldron bubble ( talk • contribs) 05:06, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Also I think the text in the "Second memorandum" section copies text from that second memorandum as hosted on CNN, but it doesn't say anywhere that the memo has been copied into the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cauldron bubble ( talk • contribs) 05:11, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
None of the four cited sources call it a "self coup". So I suggest we stick with coup. This has gone back and forth a couple of times. Whichever one we choose, we should use the same term in both places. GA-RT-22 ( talk) 19:33, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Created the talk-page for the " Eastman Memorandum" article - in any case - Stay Safe and Healthy !! - Drbogdan ( talk) 01:06, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Memorandums? Seriously? Is that considered acceptable? GA-RT-22 ( talk) 18:01, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
The second page of the first Eastman memo is quoted in the "First memorandum" section but the article doesn't say anywhere that the memo is being quoted. I don't know how to add make it clear that all that text is lifted verbatim from the memo. Could someone make the change or tell me what to do? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cauldron bubble ( talk • contribs) 05:06, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Also I think the text in the "Second memorandum" section copies text from that second memorandum as hosted on CNN, but it doesn't say anywhere that the memo has been copied into the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cauldron bubble ( talk • contribs) 05:11, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
None of the four cited sources call it a "self coup". So I suggest we stick with coup. This has gone back and forth a couple of times. Whichever one we choose, we should use the same term in both places. GA-RT-22 ( talk) 19:33, 28 January 2022 (UTC)