This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Not sure I like the Americanism of '9 April to 15 April' rather than the 9th and 15th, whatever Wiki's preferences. (also 'Act of Parliament' is the normal expresion , not 'of the Parliament' Esthameian 23:56, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Now that we have ISO 8601 week dates, it would be better to fix exactly one date, the same each year, yyyy-W15-7. 94.30.84.71 ( talk) 11:37, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
An act that has never entered into force cannot be spent. It is perhaps fine to speak of desuetude, but it is not spent. WP:GF. – Kaihsu ( talk) 06:36, 19 April 2017 (UTC):
I have no idea about the technical legal terminology involved, but as a practical matter, if any adjustments to Easter are made in future, they will almost certainly take the form of a completely new law or decree. Also, whoever is introducing HTML into the article ("<i>"), please don't... AnonMoos ( talk) 02:14, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
I agree, but that is a political statement rather than one about statute law. The Act is not yet in force until repealed (or brought into force). Kaihsu ( talk) 04:39, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Not sure I like the Americanism of '9 April to 15 April' rather than the 9th and 15th, whatever Wiki's preferences. (also 'Act of Parliament' is the normal expresion , not 'of the Parliament' Esthameian 23:56, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Now that we have ISO 8601 week dates, it would be better to fix exactly one date, the same each year, yyyy-W15-7. 94.30.84.71 ( talk) 11:37, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
An act that has never entered into force cannot be spent. It is perhaps fine to speak of desuetude, but it is not spent. WP:GF. – Kaihsu ( talk) 06:36, 19 April 2017 (UTC):
I have no idea about the technical legal terminology involved, but as a practical matter, if any adjustments to Easter are made in future, they will almost certainly take the form of a completely new law or decree. Also, whoever is introducing HTML into the article ("<i>"), please don't... AnonMoos ( talk) 02:14, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
I agree, but that is a political statement rather than one about statute law. The Act is not yet in force until repealed (or brought into force). Kaihsu ( talk) 04:39, 21 April 2017 (UTC)